originated from the animal world. so there is really a track record of coronaviruses doing this, so that s why i think it is really still the most likely explanation. my name is dominic dwyer. i m a medical virologist and infectious diseases specialist. and i have worked in public health virology for many years. professor dwyer agrees that all the current evidence points to a natural animal spill over. wild animals and farmed animals were for sale in the markets in wuhan before the outbreak. so all of these piece by piece lean towards the animal hypothesis. but it s important to remember that you don t necessarily get a single
so, had we known that, then maybe that exact wording would have been a little bit more careful. like just unlikely as opposed to extremely? maybe. if that would take the sting out, yes. i would not mind saying that. both professor koopmans and professor dwyer told me they would welcome new investigations into the laboratory leak theory if credible evidence was presented. so far, they say, all they have seen is speculation. but the world health organization lead on thatjoint mission to wuhan seems to raise some questions over how a lab leak theory could be defined. he presented a scenario to danish tv where it could be possible for a lab worker to accidentally become infected and trigger an outbreak.
still the most likely explanation. my name is dominic dwyer. i am a medicai my name is dominic dwyer. i am a medical virologists and infectious diseases medical virologists and infectious diseases specialist. and i have worked diseases specialist. and i have worked in diseases specialist. and i have worked in public health virology for many worked in public health virology for many years. worked in public health virology for many years worked in public health virology for many years- worked in public health virology for man ears. ., ., , many years. professor dwyer agrees that all the current many years. professor dwyer agrees that all the current evidence - many years. professor dwyer agrees that all the current evidence points i that all the current evidence points to a natural animal spill over. itirui’iiid to a natural animal spill-over. wild animals and to a natural animal spill-over. wild animals and farmed to a natural animal spill over. wild animals and farm
and professor dwyer told me they would welcome new investigations into the laboratory leak theory if credible evidence was presented. so far, they say, all they have seen is speculation. but the world health organization lead on thatjoint mission to wuhan seems to raise some questions over how a lab leak theory could be defined. he presented a scenario to danish tv where it could be possible for a lab worker to accidentally become infected and trigger an outbreak.
come up with a timeline for when and possibly where sars co v 2 may have spilled over from animals. there s also the fact this has happened a number of times before, most notably with the sars outbreak in china in 2003, and middle east respiratory syndrome or mers which jumped into camels and then into humans in saudi arabia. we have seen similar events, spill over events, but there also molecular evidence from evolutionary studies that at least three of the four seasonal coronaviruses, if not all of them, really originated from the animal world. so there is really a track record of coronaviruses doing this, so that s why i think it is really still the most likely explanation. my name is dominic dwyer. so there is really a track record of coronaviruses doing this, so that s why i think it is really still the most likely explanation.