there have been some filings in court, you know, making allegations. but other than that, she is still out there, and she is professing that she had never represented herself as a rothschild, which is clearly not the case. there are enough people who yeah and she s got multiple documents appearing to call her that, even though that is not actually her real name. it says something about how you get in and out of mar-a-lago, and how easy it is. the story may be wonder how many anna rothschild are golfing at mar-a-lago in this weekend. but michael sallah, thanks so much for your great reporting. appreciate it. happy to be here, thanks. still to come, this you? not the white house twitter account torching hypocritical republicans. well it s another bad, someone in their new jersey in their corner, next. er, next that s a lot of cash back. are you gonna stop me? uh-oh. i m almost there. too late! boom!
and that s you know, as as odd as that sounds that close to the incident site is not where you would expect somebody like this to be. i certainly, as of yesterday or when i went to bed last night, thought he probably had left the state already and was probably on his way somewhere out of state. um, and he certainly had the time that he could have done that. now, why he stayed so close, you know, i don t know. i was i was hoping if that were the case, that he wasn t hellbent on suicide by cop or something like that, which it turns out, it doesn t look like he was. thank goodness for that. so but overall, obviously, his behavior has been very odd. you you ve seen some of the the videos he posted professing some of his bizarre and racist ideology. do you think he s a domestic terrorist? you know, he could fit the description. i have been looking at that all day and i have been looking at statutes on domestic terrorism. you know, some of the more radical nationalist ideolog
bringing back build back better, and getting this done. we ve heard from joe manchin about it, we ve heard from the white house about it. where should the focus, be right now? there s no reason that they both can t get done. i think the energy right now, because all focuses on january 6th, schumer as laid out a deadline, or at least a loose deadline, on mlk day, that seems to be next on. deck it s essential. if there is not a way to stop the filibuster, and the mansions, in cinemas, and other democrats, and there are other democratic senators who s professing concerned about that. they have all the permission structure they need to stand up in front of a microphone and say, i did not want to do this. what s clear is, when we look down the road to january 6th, 2025, if we don t have in the senate, we re going to have another six insurrection, another kook, and that won t be successful, and marcus you will. win so get that gun, protect our democracy. there s likely going to be the
slowdown, they didn t want the situation to get out 0 of control. help us to understand, is this a legitimate shift, do you think in china, after seeing some of the images we ve been seeing in ukraine the last couple of days? i think what s going on in beijing is very clear actually. it s not in china s interest to have a war in ukraine. it s not in china s interest to have a precedent that one country can attack another country because they supposedly have a foreign policy based on nonintervention and respect for sovereignty. at the same time, xi jinping is best friends with vladimir putin. they re stuck. they don t like it, they can t oppose it. it just shows you despite professing to be a world leader and multilateral, when push comes to shove, they will side with their dictator. because murderers, dictators and
space stations, et cetera. so, yes, it s not only this deterrence that we have to make sure we acquire but also our conventional deattorneys with convention deterrence eroded because of the 9/11 wars. we are literally playing catch up here because they have us out gunned and outmanned. i understand what the president is saying professing confidence in the military, yes. he is going to do that as commander-in-chief. but, the truth is, we have erosion in our capabilities and we have got to move quickly to get that kind of deterrence. after all, the only thing we are trying to prevent here is a war. and the way we do that is the same way we did it for 40 years with the soviet union. make sure when the chinese look at the american and allied capability, that is so significant and the costs would be so great that they would not commit an act of force as a result of that. that is deterrence.