rice that she got it so wrong? through that process truth was the casualty. they got it less right. is it possible what she was doing and maybe she questioned these things as many already did by that date, but she said look the president of the united states is my boss he s asked me to do this, this is clearly he sanctioned i ll do what i m supposed to do. isn t that what people do in washington? wasn t that the loyal thing to do? clearly the president is rewarding loyalty but there s no way she can get through a senate confirmation. i guess i would demand and expect that judgment is a key factor in how you put or who you put next to you on the national security decisions. she had a total lack of judgment. she said she read the daily intelligence briefs which would lead one to believe that obviously this was a tumultuous place that terrorism was involved. i just don t understand how the
wanis al sharef that conducted this take. why did the president of libya got it right and the secretary or the ambassador from the united nations, our own susan rice that she got it so wrong? through that process truth was the casualty. they got it less right. is it possible what she was doing and maybe she questioned these things as many already did by that date, but she said look the president of the united states is my boss he s asked me to do this, this is clearly he sanctioned i ll do what i m supposed to do. isn t that what people do in washington? wasn t that the loyal thing to do? clearly the president is rewarding loyalty but there s no way she can get through a senate confirmation. i guess i would demand and expect that judgment is a key factor in how you put or who you put next to you on the national security decisions. she had a total lack of judgment. she said she read the daily intelligence briefs which would lead one to believe that