and what you found so far wasn t it. no. ok, so specifically, what did you find of probative value? anything? dave salm: no, i didn t find anything. we took his cell phones. there were two cell phones in the car. but basically nothing. no. keith morrison (voiceover): detective ruiz was assigned to the dining room, which clearly doubled as an office. keith morrison: what did you see? i saw a lot of paperwork. there was lots of papers, files everywhere on that table. room was full of paper. yes. keith morrison (voiceover): the sun was just breaking over the horizon, long rays of morning light angled through the blinds. detective ruiz was poking through all those papers and office supplies when a curious thing caught his eye. it was the way that almost horizontal beam of light glanced off a blank sheet of paper. i noticed that that white sheet of paper had several impressions on it. impressions? jose ruiz: yes. you mean some writing on it? jose ruiz: yes, like when you draw something on a
so, you know, hate is the centerpiece of the prosecution s case. so the idea that, you know, absent a confession, hey, i called arbery because of the color of his skin or our ability to crack open their heads to see what they re thinking, their attitudes, their racist beliefs, this is exactly the type of evidence that it takes for the prosecution to prove racial motive here. so if this motion gets granted, the prosecution is going to have a very difficult time proving its case. if it s denied, as it should be, because this information is relevant, then they ll be able to more readily prove their case. the court is going to assess the relevance, obviously it s highly relevant, and then it s going to balance the prejudice against the probative value. so, you know, this is bryant s motion, essentially. bryant is arguing, hey, you know, i m not affiliated with, you know, an organization that s anti-black. i ve never expressed a harming a
there were printers and copiers, invel lopes, expected to be there too. as you went around and found those things, what were you thinking? we really want that one really, really good piece of physical evidence. what you found so far wasn t it. no. okay. so specifically what did you find of probative value? anything? i didn t find anything. we took his cell phones. there were two cell phones in the car. but basically nothing. no. detective ruiz was assigned to the dining room, which clearly doubled as an office. what did you see? i saw a lot of paperwork. there was lots of paperwork. files everywhere on the table. room was full of paper. yes. the sun was just breaking over the horizon. long rays of morning light angled through the blinds. detective ruiz was poking through all those papers and office supplies when a curious thing caught his eye. it was the way that almost horizontal beam of light glanced off a blank sheet of paper. i noticed that the white
sense that multiple individuals with different experiences and different places were reporting and alleging misconduct, so that obviously in the eyes of the investigators and the careful review they did, went to the probative value, the likely truth, they thought, of these allegations. and that s what came through in the report s findings. having said all that, attorney general james also said publicly that this was all largely civil in nature. so help us understand why having said that, we re hearing about multiple criminal at least criminal reviews this week. so the reason is because the acts, even though she made findings that they violated civil laws, there are some acts that are talked about like the grabbing of the rear end or the grabbing of the breasts under the blouse, which of course would constitute a crime. but prosecutors don t prosecute by report. so i think that attorney general
In recent years, the International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC) has turned its attention to the preparation and testing of fact witness evidence in international arbitration and.