pelosi those people are beyond reach. but i think that what is possible is that we continue to build a coalition of people who will pro democratic, small d. that people understand what is going on here is a nasty brand of extremism. whether it is vaccine denial. we saw the governor richards there. whether it is some sort of crazed vigilante legislation in texas to spy on women and deny access to abortion or whether it is election denial in which people seriously are going to try to upset the election of the president who has been in office now for nine months. so i think there is a chance, in part, because the republicans are so badly overplaying their hand, so determined they are to be extremists. and i think that is a turn-off for a lot of americans. so the question is whether that
suffrage short of that that the not happen what was offered to them was a pre-selection of candidates by probe aging party and based on that people could vote for their chief executive and that is not seen by pro-democratic. party people as as what was guaranteed to them is also worth pointing out that my concern is your view seen as a protest of bush lawmaker in hong kong but let s just look at something else you talked about he talked about essentially almost signaling of the ball could be in court if she can fight for it if you can go down on her knees and beat for doesn t really making the case for kerry mom so what she can make the case for the people of hong kong could carry members we get in the favor to hong kong people it is her job to represent the people of hong kong no doubt she is the chief executive it is for mandate to represent what is in hong kong s best interest people s best interest but you have to ask yourself one question though who does she answer to so
pro-democratic, whether that s right or wrong. so in transit any one of those devices could have harmed anyone, let alone the fact that anyone opening up a package would have been harmed. i just want to say something about those procedures following on the homeland security side, the secret service. you know, there are an ex-president is always an ex-president. there is no private president obama and public president obama. so what you did see in place was the totality of security, whether it s access to mim physic him physically, access to him through cars. we don t want to say the system work because obviously this a scary day, but those layer defenses were absolutely essential given the threat matrix against former presidents as well as a sitting president. juliette, stay with us as we continue with this breaking story. multiple suspicious devices sent to cnn, to the clintons, to the
those minister that are being called to emergency meetings are not confident of any easy way out of this, but that there needs to be intense diplomacy that has already been going on. secretary kerry, as you say, will be in kiev. he s obviously going to talk to the ukrainian government, not just offer aid and support because obviously the u.s. sports of pro-european, pro-democratic part of ukraine but also to say to them, a, they cannot afford to antagonize russia militarily because they will not have a chance of winning. you saw what happened in georgiain 2008, a five-day war in georgia and russia and the georgiians came out much worse for wear. there also a to be diplomacy. president obama has to lead. he is the head of nato. there is no military solution according to the leaders so they have to continue ratcheting up the pressure and making it extremely clear to putin that any more moves will be met by countermoves in terms of sanctions, in terms of isolation, in terms of more
everyone from the old, and a ten-year civil war followed. instead of vengeance, mandela sought truth and reconciliation. he was not a saint, but rather a political genius. he did what he did because it saved his country. when he came to power, many wondered how he would steer the new country s foreign policy. after all, the african national congress had been supported by the revolution aers of the world, gadhafi, arafat, castro, but mandela knew what was in his country s best interests. he steered it in a pro-western, pro-democratic, pro-market direction, and yet he kept faith with his old comrades honoring them, never forgetting their support when he and his movement were in the wilderness. his final act of greatness was leaving office. very few black african leaders had ever left office voluntarily in 1999 when nelson mandela did after just one term. he wanted to make sure that