i will say mr. sid pallone did appear voluntarily and answer a variety of questions. he did not contradict the testimony of other witnesses and i think we did learn a few things, which we will be rolling out in the hearings to come. there is that, and also reporting on what could be a big step in the chain of testimony from another figure, steve bannon. ryan nobles joins us now but the latest. what can you tell us about what he told the committee, do we know anything? the first thing is he was behind closed doors for a significant amount of time. the committee heard testimony from cipollone for more than seven hours and as you heard from congresswoman zoe lofgren, what he had to say was productive. the got information from him that they were looking for. the question is just how much of what they have heard from prior witnesses was cipollone able to specifically confirm? there is a little bit of a caveat that they provided to that. take a listen. he could say so one s
for the paddle and it was useful. i will say that pat cipollone did appear voluntarily and answered questions. he did not contradict the testimony of other witnesses. i think we did learn a few things which we will be rolling out in the hearings to come. so, there is that and there is also reporting on what could be a big step of obtaining testimony from another figure, steve bannon. what else can you tell us about what mr. pat cipollone told the committee ? he was behind closed doors for a significant amount of time . as you heard from congresswoman loughran, and what he had to say was productive. they got information from him that they were looking for. now, the question is how much of what they heard from prior witnesses was pat cipollone able to specifically can confirm and there was a little bit of a caveat that was provided today. take a listen. he could say so-and-so was wrong which he did not say. there were things that he might not be present for or in some c
played itself out. regardless, he was in there for a long time, congressman lofgren said what they learned from him was very productive and it s going to help the investigation. we will have to see in the coming days whether any of this appears in their hearing scheduled for next week. was a new development about steve bannon? reporter: steve bannon, as you know is under indictment by the department of justice because of his lack of cooperation with the january 6th committee. he s been found in criminal contempt by the committee and is facing a trial coming up later this summer. what we are learning now is formal president trump is considering sending a letter to steve bannon, waving any privilege barriers that would prevent him from testifying in front of the committee. that could theoretically set up a situation where bannon could come in and answer questions from the committee and that would put him in a situation where he would not necessarily be facing a criminal charge.
made by cassidy hutchinson and then say did you say this in the way that she interpreted it ? and there appears to be a bit of disagreement as to about how that played itself out but regardless anderson, he was in there for a long time. congressman zoe lofgren said what they learned from him was productive and it will help their investigation and we will have to see in the coming days whether or not any of this appears in their hearings which are scheduled for next week. a possible development, what about steve bannon? steve bannon is currently under indictment by the department of justice because of his lack of cooperation with the january 6th select committee . he has been found in criminal contempt and he is now facing a trial coming up later this summer. . trump is considering sending a letter to steve bannon waiting any privilege barriers that would prevent him from testifying in front of the committee. if he were to do that, that could theoretically set up a situation where s