on the hill on that. julie: to the white house saying the president is not retreating from a fight when it comes to border security. the president says he is not going to back down from border security and he will find the money one way or the other because he has a solemn obligation to other us. we need an immigration policy that works. julie: we re two days away from the shutdown so will both sides come together? will the president get anything for his wall? we ll ask a democratic congressman next plus there is this. where, where, where? can you pull him out? bill: dramatic body cam ra now showing a police officer pulling a man out of a burning car. we ll let you know how this turned out and where in a moment. bill: give me your arm. i need your help. it s too hot. if you have psoriasis,
look, i think democrats here is the thing, despite the president s mean tweets on this issue, both sides actually do want to see some increase in border security, right? the president is hanging it all on the wall. democrats have put other border security measures on the table. i think you strip away all the politics and insanity of washington julie: i know what word came to mind when you were saying that. i can feel it. i think this is an area where we can find congress proved yesterday it knows how to find bipartisan common ground on the prison reform issue. border security is one but we just have to stop all this bill: we know what democrats don t want to do. they don t want to give this president a victory on the wall. that s what it s all about. we don t know what wall means. bill: the money is that much. this is the point.
to catch up and talk about things like their grandchildren and brexit. a big story in 2016. but because her justice department was weighing charges against bill clinton s wife that day, charges that never came, lawmakers want more information and more detail and they want it on the record this morning. bill: we ll wait for that live from the hill. thank you, sir. julie: fox news alert. a potential breakthrough on the horizon on the fight over border spending as the trump administration signals it may be open to a compromise with democrats that would actually avert a partial government shutdown. kevin corke is live at the white house with this ever-changing story. kevin, is the president softening his stance, would that be the correct way of describing it on the need for wall funding or is he doubling down? that s a legitimate question. one way or another they will get the money they need to build this wall. that is the view of white house officials who say this is the president s
in fact, the president himself said as much on twitter. let me share a bit of what he had to say on social media this morning. he said in our country so much money has been poured down the drain for so many years but when it comes to border security and the military, the democrats fight to the death. we won on the military which is being completely rebuilt. one way or the other, there it is, we will win on the wall. he had another tweet that i want to share it for perspective. he talks a bit about mexico somehow paying for the wall. he says mexico is paying indirectly for the wall through the new replacement for nafta. far more money coming to the u.s. because of the tremendous dangers at the border including large scale criminal and drug inflow. united states military will build the wall. exactly how that might play out is still anyone s guess. it is clear the president s legal team is preparing an argument. it is a win they say both for the president himself and for the american peop
user privacy means your information is private. what s the point in a privacy wall? i think that s right. this is a crisis of trust that is almost unparalleled right now. i think silicon valley is one of them facing a crisis. the notion that someone we have always traded in data. we were talking about this in the greenroom. it s not a bad thing, okay. the republic moves on. businesses do well and doesn t intrude on most people s lives. there is a difference between knowing which magazines i subscribe to or websites i click on versus reading my messages without my knowledge, without my approval. that s what facebook will have a major reckoning over. they don t understand what they re getting themselves into. using that example. if you listened on my private