might be an inside joke. it might be a brother and sister having an argument. this is absurd to me. i don t condone any of this. this is not their job. why not do that to adults? my big thing is when you say a post it is public. so it isn t quite. but statistically kids don t chose the privacy settings but should they start to chose the privacy setting you will mind their direct messaging on twitter. or will they look at the parent and say i see your mom was smoking and drinking let s call child services. we are teaching the kids to be comfortable with policing. it was banned in london after a massive backlash and now it is here in the united states. a diet supplement campaign that asks women if they are beach
presence to ensure privacy setting thes are adjusted to limit the amount of personal information available. so this is a previously unknown group and one. how should we evaluate this list? this list was posted by this group, that most have never heard of before and aitit apparently doesn t have all the hallmarks of an isis threat, how seriously do you take this the isis uniformed personnel, we have seen attacks in canada. we have seen lone wolf attacks in new york city we have seen a beheading in oklahoma what they re doing is putting a general appeal out there for a
linked to their parents account. it only became public within the last 10 days. it has no plans. it would la launch the service. they would verify the parent s account and link to the child. they would have control over kids privacy setting and application. under 13 still as of right now cannot sign up for facebook even though 7 and a half million of them are already surfing. one thing that are new children under 18 can make their facebook posts public where as before only their friends of friends could see what they posted. facebook is constantly changing how they are doing it. it is important to stay on top of it. 47 minutes after the top of the hour. a fan plunging from the stands into a bullpen 15 feet below. what he was doing moments before
you can see one wouldn t exactly fit in there. and it s a big wall. a monster. and they re submitting it to begin is in book. if you thought you could protect yourself from stalkers, on facebook, that may not really be true anymore. facebook is making a big change. it just announced it s getting rid of a privacy setting that allows you to hide your profile from the site0s search function so now in theory anybody can find you no matter what you do. according to facebook, we removing the setting because it isn t useful as it was before. now there are better ways to manage your privacy using your privacy shortcuts. the company claims only a single digit percentage of 1.2 billion people on the network use the setting. facebook adds that users can still protect their privacy by limiting who can see their photos, including posts, including photos and videos. chris is live with us here on the deck. i a know a number of people who use this setting, number of
times more than unions typically. over a long period of time. verifying the journal s new figure would involve retracing the exact methodology and making subjective judgment calls about category of spenning and the like. average voter may conclude that the 2012 cycle intensifies that both sides of every major policy dispute seem to have access to huge sums of money to get the message out. bret: that is true. thank you. public employee union in vice president biden s hometown are suing the city democratic mayor over pay cut. 400 workers in scranton, pennsylvania, including police and firefighters are now making minimum wage. mayor says it is the only way to pay if t city s bills. from minimum wage to maximum fines. wall street journal journal says google is close to paying $2 22.5 to settle charges it bypassed the privacy setting of those using the apple