illegal tries to suggest that this won t bring all the scenery down. if we move away from abortion to other privacy base rights, such as contraception, rights like gay marriage, he does try to wring fans this in, and say all we are talking about is abortion. he mentions that several times. and he suggests that it shouldn t be stretched and other areas. that s that, i m old enough to know that the court many times has said, don t try to apply our opinion on x to the situation why, because different. and, yet it often does get apply that way. but there s no question, he s trying to keep this confined to the issue of abortion. and, of course, that s telling in itself, right? to be willing to, say this is just about abortion, it s not about anything important. don t worry. tells you a lot about that, that frame of mind of behind people who would make this kind of a change. let me just ask you about one
establishing a new law that full out, full on banned abortion in its entirety in every state in the country in every instance? well, it s a draft decision, and it doesn t really get into the issue of what the federal government s power i think would be in this area. so i think it certainly leaves that open as a possibility. it might be other obstacles to that, like the legislative filibuster we still have, at least for the time being in the united states senate. but, there are points which illegal tries to suggest that this won t bring all the scenery down. if we move away from abortion to other privacy base rights, such as contraception, rights like gay marriage, he does try to wring fans this in, and say all we are talking about is abortion. he mentions that several times. and he suggests that it shouldn t be stretched and other areas. that s that, i m old enough to know that the court many times has said, don t try to apply our opinion on x to the
0 from the beginning, proportion s forces have seen this issue is a question of freedom of an individual s choice. the freedom to have an abortion is now legal in every state. and here we, are 49 years later, more than a lifetime ago for many of us. back in december, justice sonia sotomayor asked this, quote, well this institution survived the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and is reading aren t just political acts? i don t know how it will be possible. and cool. an unprecedented leak involving one of the most divisive issues in this country leaving a nation with many with more questions than answers on this unsettling monday night. but as our guest said, for those of you are watching, who are planning, or have appointments for abortion services tomorrow, another those appointments hold, you are safe as of tonight, nothing s changed. i don t that know wish you all a very good and a very safe night. from all of our colleagues from across the