nadine dorries is wrong, they will argue that rupert murdoch meddles in our democracy and this decision could give him more power to do so. it s not true. you need to remember, with a whopping revolution, murdoch essentially save the press with a that enabled the other titles to become much more successful for that enabled the sunday times to become multi sectioned and all newspapers to flourish. it was a very positive thing. it wasn t written like that at the time. some people will disagree with you. the print unions had their boot on our throats at the time. and that got rid of it and all the others followed suit. the fact is, he doesn t interfere, he doesn t interfere in the times or the sunday times of so he won t get on the phone and talk to you about stories that are in the papers or. no, i ll ask what s going on what s happening in
dean doris is wrong, they will argue that rupert murdoch already metals in our democracy and that this decision could give them more power to do so. ~ ., ., decision could give them more power todoso.~ ., ., ., ., to do so. what do you say to that? it s not true. you to do so. what do you say to that? it s not true. you need to do so. what do you say to that? it s not true. you need to - to do so. what do you say to that? i it s not true. you need to remember with the whopping revolution, murdoch essentially saved the national press. that enabled the creation of independent and enables other titles to become much more successful, and enable the sunday times to become a multi section. all newspapers to flourish. it was a very positive then. it newspapers to flourish. it was a very positive then. very positive then. it wasn t written up very positive then. it wasn t written up like very positive then. it wasn t written up like that - very positive then. it wasn t written up like
murdoch on freddie metals in our democracy and this decision could give him more power to do so. ~ ., , could give him more power to do 50, ~ ., , ., ., could give him more power to do so. . . , ., ., ., , could give him more power to do so. what is data that? is not true. so. what is data that? is not true- you so. what is data that? is not true. you need so. what is data that? is not true. you need to so. what is data that? is notl true. you need to remember, with a whopping revolution, murdoch essentially save the press with a that enabled the other titles to become much more successful for that enabled the sunday times to become multi sectioned and all newspapers to flourish. it was a very positive thing. it wasn t written about that at the time. some people will disagree with you. the print unions had disagree with you. the print unions had their disagree with you. the print unions had their boot - disagree with you. the print unions had their boot on - disagree with you.
in terms of editors, in key areas. we ve already started merging parts of it. a lot of readers now read us seven days, we re trying to do that to avoid duplication and that would were made on thing so we don t repeat stories or cover the same ground. it s just sensible. scenarios like sports and features where we agree on things. there will be people who say nadine doris is wrong, they ll argue that rupert murdoch already meddles in our democracy and this decision could give him more power to do so. that s not true. you need to remember, with the wapping revolution, murdoch essentially saved the press, it enabled the other titles to become much successful, for that enabled the sunday times to become multi section and all newspapers to flourish. it was a very positive thing. it wasn t written like that at the time. some people will disagree with you. the print unions had their boot on our
but underneath it all was the elevation of selfishness which became the predominant political domestic dogma and the consequence was felt by very many people, like my own family, because i had a brother who had severe muscular dystrophy and we were reliant on certain support mechanisms from the government. but within three years of her election, many of those support stems began to be cutaway. and so that was just one personal anecdote, but that was the feeling across the country. and as her confidence grew, she took on the miners, then she took on the print unions, and she saw an improving economy after the first five years when things were difficult. that added wind to her sails so it didn t stop. it continued. and what we then had was her so-called big bang in 1986 when she totally deregulated the financial markets. i want to hold your thought there because you have just come