talking point come that s just not true. the immigration act of 1990 which was like yesterday basically, 27 years ago, created diversity visas dedicated to channel immigrants from low rates of immigration to the united states which is to say, it gave a favor to based on national organ and disfavored others based on national origin. this is our current law. i don t understand why these executive orders areec inconsistent with this precedent? i ve got to tell you, tucker, i appreciate your creativity and appreciate your hypotheticals, the apartment of justice, your department of justice not make any of the arguments that you made. the ninth circuit and the federal court before it evaluated the executive order under well-established principles of the constitution and at every instance in the ninth circuit, they found that the governments governments were unavailing, that s the point. tucker: it doesn t get for there was at home wondering
not true. the immigration act of 1990 which was like yesterday basically, 27 years ago, created diversity visas dedicated to channel immigrants from low rates of immigration to the united states which is to say, it gave a favor to based on national organ and disfavored others based on national origin. this is our current law. i don t understand why these executive orders are inconsistent with this precedent? i ve got to tell you, tucker, i appreciate your creativity and appreciate your hypotheticals, the apartment of justice, your department of justice not make any of the arguments that you made. the ninth circuit and the federal court before it evaluated the executive order under well-established principles of the constitution and at every instance in the ninth circuit, they found that the governments governments were unavailing, that s the point. tucker: it doesn t get
talking point come that s just not true. the immigration act of 1990 which was like yesterday basically, 27 years ago, created diversity visas dedicated to channel immigrants from low rates of immigration to the united states which is to say, it gave a favor to based on national organ and disfavored others based on national origin. this is our current law. i don t understand why these executive orders are inconsistent with this precedent? i ve got to tell you, tucker, i appreciate your creativity and appreciate your hypotheticals, the apartment of justice, your department of justice not make any of the arguments that you made. the ninth circuit and the federal court before it evaluated the executive order under well-established principles of the constitution and at every instance in the ninth circuit, they found that the governments governments were unavailing, that s the point. tucker: it doesn t get
but when you weigh customs and courtesy against principle, particularly going back to the fundamental principles of the constitution, i can see where it s a legitimate decision to say, i can t be there to celebrate that. final question. i always like to focus on where do we go from here because so much of what happens in this media that i m part of is arguing. what happens next? is there something that the president could do or say that would get you on a path to thinking that he was more representative of you as an american and was fighting for your values? well, i think he d have to i think we have to address some of the issues that we ve come into. the notion that people might be singled out because of their religion. he needs to come out and say, we will never do that. the notion that people in
that matter to people. that s right. we shouldn t let the extremists have the highest ground on values. we should talk about our deepest democratic values, look voting rierkts like equal protection under the law, taking care of people when they re hurting and when they re down. many of the policies the extremists go again, the republicans in the past lifted up those policies. ronald reagan was for earned income tax credits. if you make him look like a liberal, you re pretty extreme. julian bond is a great mentor. you fight, you move, you lift up your principles of faith and the principles of the constitution. that s what we ve seen in north carolina. nearly 100,000 people showed up today. it didn t just start this year, we started seven years ago building a coalition. so what s the focus for 2014? it s obviously a mid-term