this is a raised seal to show the authenticity. this is prima fascia evidence of defacto birth. no one doubts stig s s citizenships. another part of the conspiracy theory is the birth announcement in the paper is a fake, planted by his family who wanted to trick the world into believing the future president was born in the u.s. dan is a long time reporters in honolu honolulu. a lot of people think his mother and grandmother gave false nervous he w information he was born in the united states. is that possible? under the system that existed back then there was no avenue for people to submit information that way. how did the information get in the paper? it came directly from the state department of health. we confirmed that fact with the health department, too. all birth announcements printed
show host, let s see if she s permanently an unbirther. she may get back on to it, again. let s listen. i have the president s certificate right here. it s certified, it has certification numb. it s got the registrar of the state signed. it has a seal on it and it says this copy serves as prima fascia evidence of the facts of birth in any court of birth. that should settle it. i take the president for his word. again, i would have no problem and apparently the president wouldn t either. so this story is over. well, as long as someone introduces it, i guess it s over. it s right there. there you go. what do you make of that, mayor brown? i m not sure she s committed to the truth. george did a good job of shoving it at her and she s an attorney, but she didn t really seem to want to look at it. she said i guess, i guess, if he says so.
litigation. as always in the current supreme court, you look at anthony kennedy because he is so often the swing vote, and kennedy asked a question kennedy expressed a discomforts about the issue that will mentioned which was how do you have a policy on one hand which at least on its explicit terms says no discrimination, and lots of discretion of individual managers who may or may not discriminate? the paradox of an overall policy and all that discretion was hard for him to say you can have one trial with all those plaintiffs in one case. and if kennedy is the indicator, as you said, it doesn t look good for the plaintiffs. it seems like the defendants answers are, jeff, statistics. look, if there s all these women that there s disparity in what they make versus men, it s prima fascia evidence of discrimination. it s as though the only answer could be discrimination. it plaintiffs are i think you said defendant. the plaintiffs are relying heavily on statistics. right.
and several justices seem troubled by that. there are very good statistics here. you have 80% of the hourly workers at walmart are women. 33% of the management are women. the financial disparities, you just heard it. but the law especially currently is not just discrimination in result, you have to find discrimination in fact. you have to find discrimination against these plaintiffs. there s another point here, will. i think we should clarify. not too sound too lawyering. can they go to trial? can they try to prove their case? statistics, as jeff said using the legal words, they pay a lot of money in law school to learn, fri prima fascia, can you use the statistics and so it s clear justice ginsburg, she said the company gets reports month after month showing women are passed over for promotion and there s a pay gap.
well, now that he will appear this morning with the magistrate court based on this arrest warrant, he ll have an opportunity to determine or decide whether or not he wants to accept this request or wants to fight it. if he decides he wants to fight it, they ll have about 21 days for him to make that case. and then the court will determine whether or not he s going to be set free or whether he s going to be extradited to sweden. it s a fairly straightforward process under this procedure. it s not that complicated. these charges that he s facing in sweden, i ve heard so many conflicting stories about them. some people say it s a set-up because of, you know, the website he runs, wikileaks. tell us more about these charges. well, the charges were based on what the swedish judicial authorities or the prosecutor felt was the sufficient prima fascia evidence. and they want to bring him to