needed. and again in the congressional district i serve, you can look at all 435 and there is not a congressional district out of all 435 of them where you didn t have families who benefited from this. in my congressional district, 92% of kids benefit from this tax credit that just kicked in last week. we as democrats, we made that happen. and believe me, i can tell you we re talking about that, it is incredibly important. and i like the fact that you talked about children and whether they go to bed hungry because it is more than just the words child poverty. this gets down to, you know, kids having for that matter shoes big enough to wear when they go to school. we have schools that literally 100% of the kids are on the free or reduced price lunch program. so this is money that is needed. we hope to make this permanent right now we know that we ll have this for a year. but when you are looking at the greatest lifter out of poverty
from the sun. u.v. raise can cause cancer and other damage to skin and highs and they pose a risk if the glass breaks because of the mercury contained within that took you. school may be out for the summer but that doesn t mean kids aren t getting a free meal when they need it. claude why cowan is live in san francisco. how does the summer program differ from what happens with lunch during the year? the rules changed so more children can take advantage of a program aimed at low-income families and that s where the controversy lies. during the school year students need to meet certain criteria to participate in the free and reduced price lunch program. during the summer the location needs to qualify. the meals can only be served in low income areas that anyone 18 and under can come and get fed. normally we wouldn t qualify for