going to do that? are they still going to have the funds that are going to come in to do that? you have to question the guy s whole motive. if you re saying $50 million to $60 million to acquire it. and we re talking about a drug, i guess it s about 10,000 people that use this drug regularly, with it sounds like he probably can t bring it down that much without now losing a ton of money. and shkreli was also saying a couple handful of thousand of people who take this drug. and it is a very rarely used drug, be that doesn t mean that it s not important for those folks. it s very questionable where this price will end up and i hope he s very transparent about where he does price it. dr. cory a. bear, let me bring you in. that justification he offered, and we hear this a lot about one of the great things about the united states is innovation in pharmaceuticals. we re able to come up with these drugs that deal with niche diseases, niche problems, and you need money to go into researc
armed by russia. depending on russia s response to this and verification we are looking for i think that ought to be on the table to be considered. what has been done to date with some of the sanctions is far too little and far too late. we have not taken a strong lead. the europeans have not taken a strong lead in terms of imposing economic sanctions to cripple the russian economy. we need to stop the export of arms and find ways to by pass their export of energy to europe. i think it is a defining moment for europe. you are going to sit back and let russia nibble away piece after piece of eastern europe as long as no one stands up to them and really makes them pay a price it will continue. i would rather see them step up now on tough sanctions and we can weigh what we can do or might need to do in terms of giving more support to the
and if we don t get them that day then you re going to come back the next day and you are going to stay with us until we get the document documents. is chairman issa going to do that? chairman issa the commissioner today showed a willingness to give us the january 2010, 96103. when? i want it by friday. is he going to do it by friday. we are doing contempt of congress for lois learner. with all due respect sounds like a nice man but he is the top guy. the subpoena has been turned on the irs and it is his obligation. so, you know, why not hold him in contempt if he doesn t price it. i think what he would tell you if he was here is he made a production to senate finance and he made a production to ways and means. that was end run. they dumped them on the other. the other two committees because they weren t being as aggressive. the other two committees said that s fine thank you very much. you guys have subpoenas and they didn t answer your subpoena. and one of the r
it before the vote on the bill. today. that s not that shocking. you are conflating so many things. the industry said now it will cost a fortune if we reinstate it. it s not accurate insurance stuff. not at all hard who paid for the transition for three years? fine. price it in. that was priced into the policies they are offering on the exchanges if they went to the ek changes. some didn t do it at all. they cancelled policies in the last six weeks. that is done so quick. you may not like the result. we ll see. the calculation isn t the problem. guy, we already knew the price shock was out there. cancellation. then the reality that you can t keep your dock or and the reality that you will pay more in spite of the $2500 per family per year promise to save money. what s important to remember is the context from 2010 when everybody knew it was the case. at least people paying attention
it before the vote on the bill. today. that s not that shocking. you are conflating so many things. the industry said now it will cost a fortune if we reinstate it. it s not accurate insurance stuff. not at all hard who paid for the transition for three years? fine. price it in. that was priced into the policies they are offering on the exchanges if they went to the ek changes. some didn t do it at all. they cancelled policies in the last six weeks. that is done so quick. you may not like the result. we ll see. the calculation isn t the problem. guy, we already knew the price shock was out there. cancellation. then the reality that you can t keep your dock or and the reality that you will pay more in spite of the $2500 per family per year promise to save money. what s important to remember is the context from 2010 when everybody knew it was the case. at least people paying attention