that s just a false notion people have that you must have s vote first in the house. we actually have thethe job, w have the jurisdiction in judiciary to investigate the wrongdoing of this president. i agree with that.gr there was a lot of investigation leading to nixon s impeachment or almost impeachment when he left office. but you get into this detail and it was started by senator kenny and he did all the laying out and the whole thing, sure.th but the problem you re facing m here is how do you proceed do towards impeachment, not investigation, not getting a lot of mud on the president s face. he deserves all of it, you re doing good work, but why do youy call it impeachment if it s not going to lead to impeachment. how s it going to get there to the full house?fu how does it really happen? let s be real clear i take no pride in putting mud on anyone s face. what i do take seriously is up holding the constitution, the rule of law. we get the evidence before us,
MSNBC Hardball With Chris Matthews September 12, 2019 23:50:15
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
purposes of analyzing whether we will bring forward articles of impeachment, the corruption of e this president. we re going beyond the four corners of the mueller document. i m very pleased with that. we re looking now w what the w president has done in terms of pay off, pardon, profiteering. what we did today was an important grave step to analyze for t people we re in robust impeachment investigation. but how do you do that without a resolution by the house? that s not necessarily historically. we don t need a full vote of th house for us to do our work.ur in fact, in the nixon n administration the house judiciary committee then withouh power of subpoena, the rules have changed in the meantime, worked for five to six months investigating prezzen nixon, so