there. they did a good job of a good job of defending, when the prosecution rested of testing. i thought they did a good job in their closing remarks. greta: when was the first vote besides the fore issue? i wanted to take a prevote. i wanted to see where people stood. we voted right away. greta: you raise our hand or secret? you raise your hand. greta: what was the split the first vote? for which indictment? hurt. 10-2. ten murder. 10-2. 10 innocent, 2 guilty. greta: when was that? we on the first day, it was within the first hour. greta: there s not a lot of persuading? not for a prevote.
stood. we voted right away. greta: you raise your hand or secret? you raise your hand. for murder it was 10-2. 10 saying it was ten innocent, two guilty. greta: 2:15 when do you think that was? i can t remember when. greta: hour, two hours, next day? it wasn t the next dame within the first hour. greta: not a lot of persuading? not for the prevote. greta: there were two, were they adamant on guilty or uncertain? i believe with one there was an uncertainy one was pretty add man. greta: adamant that it was guilty? uh-huh. greta: what changed that not guilty? with that person i didn t get into that.
in the case. there was one in particular who did a great job of helping me through the process and keeping things organized for us. asking the questions when we needed to ask. i wanted to know everyone s thoughts. i called it a round robin discussion. where nobody else could speak. everyone had to say their thoughts on any issues. we did this a number of different times throughout the course of deliberation. when i would come back around, the guy that helped me out a lot did a good job of bringing up questions and points that we needed to look at. greta: the first day of deliberations about what time do you go too the room, do you remember? i can t remember the exact time between 2:15 and 2:45 we went in. greta: when was the first vote beside the foreperson issue? i wanted to take a prevote. i wanted to see where people
heart wrenching. were there tears? yes. was there somebodying? there was sobbing there will be was tears. what time did you go in the room? i wanted to take a prevote. i wanted to see where we stood. we voted right away. you raise your hand or it s a secret. you raise your hand. what was the split the first vote in for murder. 10-2. 10 saying it was 10 innocent, 2 guilty. it many interesting right from the get-go there were 10-2 for not guilty. that gives you some level of indication how certain the jury was. it does. when the prosecution rested we thought because we did not go in researching as much we were some of what an open book. when they rested, i just i was stunned. i was stunned.
through the process and keeping things organized for us. asking the questions that we needed to ask. one thing that i did was i wanted to know everyone s thoughts. so i called a round-robin discussion that we were going to have, where nobody else could speak, everyone had to say their thoughts on any issues. we did this a number of different times throughout the course of deliberation. and when i would come back around, you know, the guy that helped me out a lot did a really good job of bringing up questions and points, you know, that we needed to look at. the first day of deliberation, about what time do guinto the room, dong do you remember? i can t remember the exact time. i want to say it was possibly. 2:00, 2:15 and 2:45. when was the first vote on it? before the foreperson issue? i wanted to know. i wanted to take a prevote. i wanted to see where people stood.