Translator in total, its about 79. The constitution says the census must count everyone so that means noncitizens, too. As we head into the 2020 elections, can Americans Trust the system . Or is the swamp too deep . Thats a challenge in parts of drain the swamp the country like this. Where theres a fear of the government, a fear that only increased since President Trump took office. What are the people so worried about . Translator because the i never thought in Elementary School growing up families here are mixed. Some of them may not have their learning about elections in documents. America that one day i would be some were born here. Talking about the worlds so youre giving your addresses, greatest democracy, vietnam. Youre giving your personal vietnam has the best Voter Turnout. Information, where you live. So i think that could be they put us to shame. Intimidating to the community. Vietnam, dominica, uruguay, malta, seychelles, ecuador, turkey, then on page, basically at the end,
think this march jade builds in some of that. a month, two months, and still the nation s very strong interest in having a verdict before election is served. the big way of if you have time is an appeal and that, for example, i, think will be happening in fulton county, where removal motions and you bet that trump will bring in at the last minute our appealable. but the different actions to challenge the whole case here, that laurel has telegraphed, that it s pretextual, it s reprisal for hunter biden, that trump has immunity, none of them at least has automatic right of appeal. it will be up to traffic. and so assuming she is a strong gatekeeper here, i think they have to go in little bite size chunks, and that can t get them far enough. so the big issue is, can they get a look at the court of appeals. even then, by the, way the
the big way of if you have time is an appeal and that, for example, i, think will be happening in fulton county, where removal motions and you bet that trump will bring in at the last minute our appealable. but the different actions to challenge the whole case here, that laurel has telegraphed, that it s pretextual, it s reprisal for hunter biden, that trump has immunity, none of them at least has automatic right of appeal. it will be up to traffic. and so assuming she is a strong gatekeeper here, i think they have to go in little bite size chunks, and that can t get them far enough. so the big issue is, can they get a look at the court of appeals. even then, by the, way the court of appeals is primed for trump s really delaying tactics. but absent that, i don t think they re going to be able to eat
subpoenaed to go to capitol. i went ed to go there to brief the houe intelligence and the senate intelligenceintellig committeese china s efforts. and it was based in part upoinn of the details that you re talking about relating to eric swalwell and feinstein . and, you know, incrediblyibly t and the fact that, you know, again, to your pointrofa, the fi in this case, a very dubious investigation, resulted in defensive briefings for for both feinstein and swalwell. e and i will add a defensive briefing for hillary clinton whenillary. the the issue of foreign interference or involvement in her campaign came up, but a very different approach to donald trump. well, and the whole idea of russians in his campaign and i g will say this, i want to go ahead. they didn t really give himd it whey didn t really give himd a briefing. that was kind of a trap setting, wasn t it? tit was. i mean, not to go back over. yeah, it s pretextual. yeah . pretext to spy on the campaign and which whichc
control until the supreme cour case in griswold finds a right to privacy under substantive due process for people to be able to access that. they re reviving that act, it not right? let me just say i didn mean to suggest that this is all pretextual this is filed in amarillo wher the judge is the only federa judge sitting because they kne that he would respond in thi way, so it is very clear wha the interest was and why thi was done so this is not a rationa decision and the way and the tax even makes it clear. with regards to the act, it wa passed a 1979 to prohibit th distribution of quote unquot articles used for immora purposes through the federal mail service or interstate commerce that could be a lot of things, information about birth control, actual birth control, even erotica and sex toys and thing of that nature but it was meant to cut down o vice the law that you mentioned tha was invalidated in 196