Disregard house rules. For what purposes . Just completelyusrules on not i wanted to confirm point addressing the Minority Hearing today. If i hear t that one more time, of order is the rules of ill address that when were decorum. I dont believe the gentleman marking up impeachment articles. What is the use of a minority from florida meant to violate him andnt i want to give him to hearing day if youre going have benefit of o doubt. To hear evidence of the markup than once he referred if you get the confirmation of to a new york lawyer. If hek is prepared to explain what he meant, i will withdraw the master bedroomrkup yourself. My Point Of Order. Even the most heated development does not know show any way that that is not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, Point Of Order can be theyre. If you destroy the institutional regarding the schedule. There is no Point Of Order integrity, which again, the staff have talked about today, regarding the schedule. Well, onf this case there
Pope Francis speaks by phone with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who thanked the Pope for his constant prayers as the nation endures ongoing .
people to decide. he is inviting foreign senior level. interference,s allowing foreig i ve got to think there are people who worked on this for governments to decide that for us. months, professionally, mr. e orgoldman, it s been confd carefully, seriously who see mr. that president trump s campaign barr come out and mr. durham who actively sought russia s interferencely in our 2016 until today is. thought to hava good reputation. elections, correct? mr. durham out of the blue what special counsel mueller without offering any receipts, said is that president trump did we don t agree with some of the invite them and solicit them to hack hillary clinton s emails. report s conclusions to the predication of how the fbi case ultimately, the trumpma campaigi think wastr welcomed, knew abou was opened. helpe me out here, david. the interference, welcomed it i thought it s the i.g. that and utilized it. right. audits the u.s. attorneys. and in 2016, trump said russia, why does mr. durham t
our own ears. so mr. goldman, i d like your help in responding to some of the claims that my republican colleagues have made today. happily. the president and his allies say that there was no quid pro quo. in other words, they claimhe th the president wasn t withholding the aid in exchange for the manufactured political investigation. isn t it true that the aid was withheld andas that there has bn no logical explanation for the withholding of that aid? there is common sense that leads one to conclude that the aid was withheld for the investigations, and then there is also direct evidence in that the president s own words to ambassador sondland on september 7th said the same thing. thank you. president trump knew he had leverage over presidente zelensky, and in fact david holmes testified that ambassador sondland told president trump that president zelensky will, quote, do anything you ask him.