now, it doesn t matter that our medical professionals were wrong about lockdown s wrong about the vaccine stopping transmission, wrong about natural immunity and wrong about shutting down the schools. they still want to control you. these people are shameless. today, an advisory panel to the centers for disease control voted 15 to zero to add the covid-19 vaccine to the vaccines for children program. now, the vaccine, as it s called, is a federally funded program that provides free vaccines to families who can t afford them. this now paves a way for what is likely a foregone conclusion, adding a vaccine to the list of vaccines required for school admission. now, in other words, the covid-19 vaccine would be on the same list for most states as like measles, polio, et cetera. that vote will take place tomorrow. now, this is quite literally insane. and should be challenged in court immediately. this could mean millions of children across the country could be denied school becaus
Whatwe that means, its to use e power of the office to obtain an improper personal benefit while ignoring orfi injuring the national interest, or acts in ways that are grossly inconsistent with and undermine the separation of powers that is the foundation of our democratic system. Now, this question of whether the president engaged in abuse of power came up before when this congress considered the impeachment of president nixon. And president nixon famously said, if the president does it, it is notde illegal. And this body rejected that because thats not so. That goes directly contrary to what the founders said. But President Trump has said the same thing in responding to the prior investigation by the Department Of Justice and defending his conduct. Heres what he said. I have an article 2 where i have the right to do whatever i want as president. That he has the right to do whatever he wants as president. That is as wrong as when president nixon said a similar thing. That is not what
sailing of the titanic. i mean, why do you do this? why would you do that? i would have him just like as the end. ave if we want to tweak the ending, you know, when we have the big v premiere party, he shoule d have him on one of his stage left and then right and then he hasir been doing that robotic thing for a while. so tryinobg to let you do this, that ll be the ingram . that ll be the t. will get on tv. okay, later. good.oble yeah.m here the big problem here and you see it in some of those clips,os you ve seen it over the lastips, two years. the presiden t, it is clearlyd by t being managed and choreographed by the white house teaheitm. t y and the problem is they re not very good at what they do. for instance, the president st digital team attempted togi produce a piece toutintal teamgo the ease of biden s studentan loan forgiveness program. well, a little piece of advice to them. if you re going to add sound to, the president typing on his phone, it helps if his his fingf are act
chair. the topic of the hearing is the president s misconduct, so none of us should find it surprising that we are hearing testimony that is critical ofsu the president.st i do not o find that the witness comments are disorderly. i find they are pertinent to the subject matter of this hearing. the witness would be able to continue, except that his time is expired. tichairman, it s not my point of order is not that his words are disorderly. they are unparliamentary. they violate the rules of the house and should be taken down. this is not about his conduct. he is talking about the motives and the character of the president of the united states. the gentleman willve suspend. the rules of decorum apply to members of the house, not to witnesses. the gentleman may proceed. i appeal the ruling of the chair. that is not a ruling. it is a ruling on a point of order and it s appealable. that is a ruling. the point of order is not