seeing it and russians and iranians and enemies including the chinese are now teaming up with others in terms of energy production, are seeing it as well. we re lacking the credibility of the world stage. trace: i want to put this up on the screen. this is michael goodwin of the new york post talking about the president s putin out of power comment, he said the following, quoting here, what biden so clearly said is not at all what he meant, clearly talking about the white house backing this up. how in the hell can a line like that so explicit it could potentially lead to world war iii get into a presidential address if the plain meaning wasn t the intent? of course the washington post has reported that the white house is saying the president ad-libbed that. that was not part of the script. is that what you believe happened, it was ad-libbed and he just kind of went off-the-cuff? if he was a serious leader he wouldn t be ad-libbing messages
you had ambassador smith on this morning answering for it. i m actually glad he called out putin. the white house had to take it back, it makes the president look like he s out of touch and and not under control, and that s bad. john: former national security council employee? he also told american troops the day before that they were going to be sent to ukraine and a few hours later told president duda that the u.s. would accept an additional 100,000 ukrainian refugees, to me, those were bigger problems. john: also said he would respond to a chemical weapons attack in kind. no. thank you, panel. [laughter] we will see you again next sunday. up next, a final word on the week ahead and how you can help the people of ukraine. (customer) [reading] save yourself?! money with farmers? (burke) that s not wrong. when you switch your home and auto policies to farmers, you could save yourself an average of seven hundred and thirty dollars. (customer) that s something. (burke) get a whol
confirmation hearings have become one of washington s partisan. all right now on fox news sunday. jon: hello again from fox news in washington, the president is back on u.s. soil this morning after a blistering speech in europe where he slammed russian president vladimir putin and gave a stark warning to stay out of nato territory. the president also appeared to call for putin s removal but the white house walking that back this morning. this comes after days of meetings with nato allies on how to support ukraine as russia continues indiscriminate shelling one month into the invasion. in a moment we will discuss president s speech with julianne smith. we begin with team coverage mike tobin on the ground in lviv. first rich edison in the white house with reaction to biden s
president s speech condemning vladamir putin, before a crowd of ukrainian refugees, took the stage to once again phrase putin s intelligence to the cheers of his followers again. yes, putin was smart. and i thought he was going to be negotiating. i said, that s a hell of a way to negotiate. the binding tie in both cases is a love of naked power. and a contempt for inclusive democracy. most recently shown here in the u.s. by the senate republican s treatment of supreme court nominee judge ketanji brown jackson. during her confirmation hearings. add to that, a wife of a supreme court judge, who was so concerned for the future of this country that she pushed to try to overturn an election because
mr. president, do you want putin removed? mr. president, were you calling for regime change? no. just a one-word answer, but did have america s top diplomat come out to explain what the u.s. policy is. president putin cannot be empowered to wait for or engage in aggression against ukraine or anyone else. as you know, and as you have heard us say repeatedly, we do not have a strategy of regime change in russia. and that is the talking point circulating around the administration because the u.s. ambassador to nato used the same exact words. well, let me be clear and just state right off the bat that the u.s. does not have a policy of regime change towards russia, but i think what we all agree on is that president putin cannot be empowered to wage war. 40% approve of the