last night which would tip off how one of the judges said something in effect this covers 15% of the muslims in the worlds, something like that. i think that s the way he said it wasn t a religious ban. yeah. here s the judge there are 40 countries that are muslim countries, the largest countries in the world, indonesia, pakistan, go on and on, saab rain ya, they saudi arabia. a list agreed on by congress and president obama, state sponsors of trriserrorism, countries whe they re war torn, is a moul ya, ye yemen, syria. we don t have good connections with government. it was a reasonable statement. president obama did a temporary ban on movement when he was president for a short period of time to be able to valts whevalt we were going to do. it s not unreasonable for president trump to say let s look at everything, now it s working. that was incredibly sloppy in the implementation. general kelly has already stepped out and said, hey, we handled this wrong, it was four days of cha
washington. yes. that s a first. anyway, very nice to see you. great to see you, greta. after the break, controversy over president trump, his daughter, ivanka, and a department store. is this about business or politics? in a minute now, the senate to begin voting on president trump s pick for attorney general of the united states. to err is human. to anticipate is lexus. experience the lexus rx with advanced safety standard. experience amazing.
yeah, i think that s you saw trump referencing it today. i mean, that s what that s the crux of his argument that if the court rules against him, that it s about politics. he s trying to kind of if it rules for him, is that politi politics? or is that national security? that would be the logical question to ask. no, we would expect him to then argue they ruled correctly on grounds of national security and keeping the country safe. he appears to be working the refs here a little bit and laying the predicate for, hey, look, country, you re with me, see these numbers and if the court rules against me, it s all politicses jonathan? he s put neil gorsuch in a really uncomfortable position. we ve just seen literally minutes ago there was a new york times piece that broke that said gorsuch described trump s comments about the independent judiciary as demoralizing. we re seeing him do his charm and woo tour on the hill and having to deal with questions, you know, from all the
has done is it s just made democrats more emboldened to continue to fight the trump cabinet nominees and also the trump and republican agenda. leigh ann, thank you. with me, a member of the intelligence committee and homeland security committee. nice to see you. great to see you. the issue, what happened last night with elizabeth warren, would you have shut her down? it s not a matter of shutting her down but build comedy again. a rule affectionally called rule 19, you can impugn another senator directly or indirectly. there had been about six hours of debate about jeff sessions already, a lot of information out there, a lot of statements out there, both parties engaging in debate. when elizabeth warren got up to speak, it was a different level. it was a different tone. and the majority leader saw it. she was using words like disgraceful, talking about reading letters and saying you should have resigned, saying
president donald trump saying today that his immigration order will make the country safer. is the president right? speaker paul ryan backed trump s vetting measures saying trump is right, though he says the rollout of the travel ban was confusing. but senator john mccain doesn t agree. he says the order could undermine anti-terrorism efforts. here s what he told me last night. wonder what would have happened if there had been notification to the leaders of congress, the usual vetting by the agencies that are involved rather than this kind of out of the blue explosion that took everybody by surprise. it seems that the m.o. of this white house is on a shakedown cruise. ten former diplomats and national security officials, most democrat, told the court of appeals the order, undermines the national security of the united states. john mclaughlin was acting director of the cia under president george w. bush, now at