supreme court in 1992 in a decision co-authored by justice kennedy for judge kavanaugh is trying to replace, the supreme court described it as something that can t be overruled. if judge kavanaugh believes this he believes this about any particular decision. it opens up yesterday every time he got a question about affirmative action, race, same-sex marriage, environmental regulations the answer was pres de precedent. this e-mail will feed the opposition to say you don t believe that much in precedent. you don t believe it for roe so what s to think you believe it for these other things. i think the democrats have a really good, almost smoking gun argument for why they should see the documents and why the american public should.