actually, didn t see anything. sometimes have you people with a narrative. people who are teaing one side. as you point out, it s a good example, sometimes you just have people who want to feel like they re part of it. danny, i want to take one more question to you. you know, if you look at this issue that we re seeing with the witnesses, some might say this is greater proof that the process wasn t done right, that the prosecutors should have screened the witnesses and then only presented those who they deemed credible. what do you think? well, that assumes first that the ultimate objective for a prosecutor is to always secure an indictment? if you take a step back, that s want the prosecution s role. yes, the prosecutors may have had a preformed idea that influenced the way they presented this information, but that s what we pay prosecutors to do. looking at it from another
contribution along the way. you know certainly my siblings have chosen different paths to give back and there are a lot of different ways to do that these days. a lot of great kennedy family stories that are in the documentary. one favorite, part of it is according to the documentary, robert f. kennedy would come home, sit at table after visiting impovished counties in the south and say to his kids as they were sitting around the dining room table, we re very lucky, incredibly fortunate. that sort of that thread of values flowed through every part of the kennedy legacy and especially legislatively, eric. i think, correct me if i m wrong, it s always seemed that bobby s experience in the south and in appalachia awakened something in him. yes. it s not like he went there with a preformed idea. right. le went there and had his eyes opened to something he hadn t fully grasped and that