In a putative class action sure to sour the taste in some manufacturers' mouths, an Illinois consumer alleges that naturally flavored water with a "Twist of Lemon" misrepresents the amount of real lemon.
taxpayer dollars in my view. there were several other lawsuit pending. the government didn t have to file a suit too. one part upheld is the part that deals with the so-called sanctuary cities. so a citizen of arizona would be able to attempt to get cities to enforce the law, whatever it might be. but that s a small consolation given the bulk of the law was declared unconstitutional. what i think it means is, if the state of arizona let s say were to pass a law that says you can t get state welfare benefits, if you re not an american citizen and therefore, some department in arizona had to check the immigration status of people, that could be declared unconstitutional as federally preempted. i don t think that argument would hold. so i don t understand how the judge s ruling about adding a burden to the federal government can be the basis for undoing the statute on preemption grounds.
preemption grounds. greta: we are caught in the weeds fighting about all the issues, when the problem is arizona wants its borders more secure. most people believe that we need a standard national immigration policy, whatever it is. so while the federal government is suing the state, we re not dealing with any of these problems. i guess secretary napolitano says there is more being done about the borders. we are moving forward. it is not enough. it is true they ve added resources. that doesn t answer the question, is it enough? secondly, there are still policy decisions that have to be made, such as, implement implementing operation streamline on all sections of the border. operation streamline puts people in jail when they cross repeatedly and a great deterrent. once you put people in jail they stop trying to cross in that area. combination of policy changes and some additional resources, 800 border patrol agents in