requiring legislation. in 2008 it appears she backed off that point. she says i don t want the federal government preempting state and cities like new york that have very specific problems. perhaps a change in tone. back to you guys. keeping them honest. thanks, elizabeth. 36 minutes after the hour. other stories making headlines. the family of the san bernardino terrorists picking up belongings from the couple s home finding it draped in stars and stripes. syed farook s mother, brother and brother-in-law were seen packing a u-haul with furniture, boxes and toys for the orphaned daughter. they believe the landlord or a neighbor put up the flag they believe. tashfeen and they killed 14 people and injuring 22 others. the couple later died in a shootout with police. take a look at this. a student blatantly disrespecting his teacher. the arkansas high schooler senior, he s blowing smoke in his teacher s face. why? because the teacher apparently
to discuss what happened in yemen. what do you expect the international security will be able to do about this chaos in yemen? yemen, victor, is a cauldron right now. it is going to be one of the biggest questions we have because they don t have anything in place a effective government. when president hadi left, that caused a lot of spin into an abyss. the comments made earlier about the state department monitoring threats, yes, they are, but it s more from a military perspective. we have gone more into the defensive mode of what might come out of aqap towards the united states, and that s the important part. aqap, al qaeda in the arabian peninsula based in yemen, has been one of the biggest threats we ve seen in terms of terrorist events against the united states. we were offensively striking targets there, preempting potential attacks and now without any intelligence in that
nazis. every single year he s been in politics it s been 1938. president obama sees himself as richard nixon going to china to change the geopolitical map of iran. these are legacy questions. they can t back down. is that reasonable? for iran to change its attitude and cooperate, no longer support what the united states considers to be terrorist organizations, actually accept israel s right to exist, is that even doable? not a chance, wolf. this is a business deal. they need really something from sanctions and the obama administration needs something. preempting an israeli military strike and that seems to me an unsentimental bargain. this is not a transformation. where do we go from here, ari? two votes in congress will be crucial and a massive fight over those votes and a lot of democratic support for israel
out a nuclear facility in iraq steve, and said we ve had our differences before essentially. he s trying to open the door, it appears to reconnecting in a stronger way saying this is just part of the fabric of our relationship. come home in a sense. right. and you know he made a joke about the united states and israel having differences in the past and those being differences that you have within the family. i thought that was all appropriate to suggest that, you know, these are the kinds of policy differences that one might expect particularly given the different circumstances in which the israelis are today and where the united states is today but i agree with pete. what he was trying to do is refocus after all of the debate that we ve heard for weeks, after all the news reporting, after reports that the administration is preparing a counter offensive for netanyahu s speech that might have at one point included a counter speech from president obama to sort of prebutting or preempti
report on what happened on august 21st, when the u.s. says 1400 syrian civilians were killed by the syrian regime s use of chemical weapons. reporter: that s right. monday, everyone is telling me that s when we should see this report. it will be a very detailed document, showing basically everything from how the samples came out of the ground to what finally was in them. now, one western diplomat is saying to me that this will be able to suggest potentially who was behind it. it s not the u.n. inspector s mandate to assign blame but the level of detail they put in this report, this western diplomat says may allow some people to draw conclusions of who was behind it. there are some people speculating that perhaps syria s move today is preempting this particular report. we have to wait and see quite how that develops. but monday, we ll see this definitive report from the u.n. which they say is entirely independent and credible, specifying what was used on the 21st of august and perhaps