in 1982, she invited lenny scutnick considered a hero for saving somebody s life. now, they are called scutnicks for that reason. which television show did rob gibbs, then president obama s press secretary promise that president obama would not interrupt with his state of the union? which tv show was it? lost? you got it. abc thriller. gibbs say i don t foresee a scenario where millions of people who hope to get conclusion with lost are preempted by the president. whew! thank goodness for that one. you guys are fantastic. everybody ends up with a sticker. i love it. up next, the gop. i ll give you one for hanging
i think we discussed that yesterday. jenna: and we ll continue to discuss this issue in the days to come. james, thank you. reporter: thank you. jon: as james said kerry latka still undecided. if you are you might want to hear what the president has to say. he s campaign right now in manchester, new hampshire, four votes up tore grabs, electoral votes up for grab in that state and both candidates are hitting it hard. if you d like to hear what the president has to say we have it streaming live on foxnews.com. back to the libya issue, a significant development on what we know about the terror attack in benghazi, and a possible motivation for that attack on our consulate september 11th that killed four americans. our chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge has been investigating this story since it happened and is live in washington. reporter: thank you and good morning. two military sources tell fox news that the attack on benghazi could have been preempted, moment to dr
factor and something called law and order are all preempted but you will take sports over a night of politics, right? who would want to watch two out of touch politicians answer questions when the tigers are playing the royals in ksansas city. you probably think the debates are really boring or you decided who you are voting for in may like normal people. what you need is a twitter buddy. what s a twitter buddy? it s a debate ambassador of sorts and it will save your life. pick a few. watching a live debate while following your favorite twitter personalities will make a wonky and depressing live puppet show super fun. good debate twitter buddies fit the following criteria. they let you know when to drink because that s important. and you need a list of words so you know when to do that.
book matt ken ard, retired colonel jack jacobs, msnbc analyst. gentlemen, glad to have you here. an absolutely fascinating discussion we ll have about this book. matt, how pervasive of a problem are you alleging this is? well, the figure that s often used is 1,500. that sounds low in a military of over 2 million, but some of those people are some of the most violent and criminal-minded people in america. so if you think of it like that, all it takes is one of them to lose it on one occasion like we saw with the oak creek massacre, which was carried out by a veteran of the u.s. army from the 1990s. tragedies like that, i mean, are rare, but the threat they pose has increased marketedly over the past decade. you ve kind of preempted something here i was going to pick up. but, look, 1,500 you re suggesting here, are you somewhat managing to pluck needles from a haystack? because the u.s. military is massive.
majority to prevent states from enforcing those same laws as written. well, right, because he puts a real predicament on the table which is the reality. supreme court opinions are written under constitutional theory but there are real consequences when those decision -rs implemented. and arizona is in a very difficult spot here. you ve got portions of the law that were deemed preempted. the guts of the law the big provision that was the controversial provision is held constitutional, that is the provision which allows for the stopping and asking if there is a concern that there may be an illegal situation that they were to mandate a contact to immigration. now immigration has been told by the president for certain age groups, don t enforce the law. this puts the states in the worst possible place, where even laws that the supreme court in today s opinion said were constitutional, and could be implemented can absolutely have no effect for certain age groups. no wonder justice scalia w