Bolton. Later, trumps trial judge, tanya chutkan, what we know about the sentences shes already given other january 6th defendants. And ukraine, a remarkable rescue. A ukrainian soldier saved with the help of a drone, which delivered medical supplies and water. Good evening. Tomorrow the former president of the United States will make his second appearance in a Federal Court as an alleged felon. The first was in miami in the documents case. Until donald trump in the 234 years since George Washington has held the office, no holder of the office has had to do that once. Tomorrow, the 44th president since washington will enter a Federal Courthouse in washington, just a short walk from the capitol. Hell be asked by a federal magistrate to plead to four counts in an indictment. An effort that special counsel jack smith said yesterday was, quote, fuelled by lies. And criminal or not, there were plenty of those lies. The indictment identifies 21 separate lies the former president told, lies a
predecided over dozes of criminal cases against alleged january 6th rioters. she has often been outspoken at their sentencing hearings. at a 2022, for two friends that had gone to the capitol, chutkan said, this wasn t bill and ted s excellent adventure. they came to washington knowing full well the actions of january 6th. she also called it a violent attempted overthrow of the government that almost succeeded. at a criminal sentencing of another rioter, she said this. he did not go to the u.s. capitol out of any love for our country. he went for one man. one man in that sentence would be donald trump. this won t be the first time chutkan has dealt with a case involving the former president. chutkan rejected trump s efforts to block the house committee investigating january 6th from accessing more than 700 pages of records from the white house.
in a 9-0 decisions. a lot of different reasons the justices got to this opinion, they sided with catholic charities and sent this case back down to the lower court to be redecided. so what we have here is essentially nine justices and an interesting makeup. chief justice writes this primary opinion and what they say is this. they talk about the free exercise clause of the first amendment saying congress should make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. it is plain the city s actions have burdened the catholic charities group by putting it to the choice of curtailing its mission or approving welationships inconsistent with its beliefs. either the catholic charities can t do what they feel is a mission for them. work and place foster children and be part of that program in the city of philadelphia or have to turn away from catholic church doctrine and what it believes about same sex relationships. a lot to read here. there is not a single dissenter. it is an interesting opini
i got got and they have like a gok is this the kind of work you expected? well, edecided to come here, i was tr flowers. i don t have the kind to go to school but i don t see any choice here. like many other poor immigrants, he had to speak uni
end up? also the things that the congressman wants to hear about, learn from all these depositions. we heard from that from him. is it realistic to get that information at the speed they re hoping for? he used the word stonewalling. does any of this testimony end up in court before they get to take it. that could drag things out obviously. that has a way of chilling the momentum. the republican critique is you re just jamming this through, you just want to achieve the political end you predecided. so there is a balance for them to worry about. liz, what is your your takeaway? what struck me is the congressman talk about only 3% of american people read the report, but millions watched the testimony. so what i m wondering, they so