had a lot to do with the shooter s feelings about the military. many would argue it was a terrorist act. this seems to be very difficult. so it s not so much about the military but the man himself. you look at the distinction between behavioral and mental health related. that s because you re concerned people stigmatize people dealing with mental illness as being violent? is that it? i m really concerned about that, because that really is the case. that s what we re faced with. we know that those are a risk factor, but we say over and over again, people that have debilitating or serious mental health issues are not at greater risk to commit violence. the violence you saw yesterday similar to the violence you saw five years ago at fourth hoard,
predato predatory, violent, well thought out. it is inconsistent with someone who s debilitated by a mental i llness. again, i want to distinguish 2009 from this shooting as historically as we can. i would argue that wasn t a mental health situation at all. that s why we received the death penalty. again, looking at this situation, you then have the other side of the mental health analysis which is, well, was it being properly treated. and if it wasn t, did that then allow yet another unstable person to be in proximity of a weapon and be able to use it and hurt others like we see in so many other mass shootings. what about that side of it? absolutely. it could be another risk factor. if there wasn t treatment or if the individual didn t like the treatment or the individual wanted them to say you do have