medical information about people. you start combining dna with that. you have got a dna version of the manchurian candidate. you can target the dna. the dna will target the president. that s one of the worst case scenarios going through my mind is targeting political leadership. preexisting conditions, family history, all those things go into being able to create a precision munition that works at the virus level. dan: is there a way to keep your dna away from one of these hostile countries? a cheek swap, how would you even know? a lot of people got notices saying your information been compromised. it got sent to testing and got
f everything as described is very quick in and out very quickly. it s going to be incredibly destructive. and the reason you want to put forces on the ground is you not only can conduct the raid, you minimize the risk because of the speed and the training, but you also can do confirmation on the target. if it went in with some type of precision munition, we probably would have had to go back in and do some forensic dna work. we dcan do that on the spot if the soldiers, if they are s.e.a.l.s. doesn t really matter. these are incredibly interchangeable parts but they can get that done on the ground and get extracted very quickly. and the technology today makes this fascinating. we learned this in the days of the bin laden raid and in some other special operations since. the president of the united states at the white house. the pentagon brass watching this play nout realtime including the head of the helicopter that had some mechanical problems and the men on the ground in this mission
is get frustrated and use inaccurate systems such as artillery, rockets and so forth and then perhaps some precision weapons as well. although as we ve seen in a number of the precision munition that s have been directed at buildings that only have innocent civilians, regular government buildings, military location ands so forth. eventually i think we ll see what we ve seen russia do in other locations where they were unable to use ground and air forces effectively together which is again also what we ve seen here. and they will pummel the city and destroy section by section. they will starve the people out, depopulate it as they did, of course in, olepo. but there is a difference here. and that is that you and a bunch of other journalists are watching every single will action that they take filming every strike. and that is going to stoke more and more and more outrage around
the fact that they used one simply was a demonstration in my mind, which is we the russians own it, and you, nato, and the united states don t own it. but it seems odd to me that they would use this type of precision munition that is mach-5, very close to the earth and incredibly maneuverable to go after stationary targets. you don t need to do that. we re going see if they do it again, and what other kind of weapons the russians bring to bear. the ukrainians have been very successful with the javelins and the stinger missiles, wolf. the weaponry here so critical as we enter the next phase of this war. you re absolutely right. cnn s brian todd, retired army major general spider marks. thank you very much. coming up, more on the breaking news. we re going live to the polish-ukrainian border for the late ohs tonight fast-growing refugee crisis. the u.n. estimate morse than 3.5 million ukrainians have now fled putin s foforces.
by russian forces. is this to say that vladimir putin will not stop at anything? well, of course they did that in syria. that is not surprising. i d also say they re running out of precision munition. so, to some extent they re just firing rocket artillery and shell artillery into the cities randomly. these are not targeting a check point. this is terrorizing the same population. but, richard, i didn t respond to your question on chemicals. i think he was hinting at a false flag operation. i don t believe he s going to do it. if he employs chemical ls chemicals aren t very good against the u.s. army. we re prepared to fight and operate in a chemical environment with nearly the same effectiveness as we would without the equipment. but if they use it against civilians in the ukraine, it will cause mass casualties. and i think that would trigger