settled as a precedent of the supreme court. one of the important things to keep in mind about roe v. wade is that it has been reaffirmed many times over the past 45 years. as richard fallon from harvard said, roe is not a super president because this overruling never ceased, but that doesn t mean that it should be overruled. it just means that it doesn t fall under the small handful of cases like margaret versus madison, and brown versus the board, but no one questions anymore. so, katie, do you, first. melissa, i want you to weigh in. are they just crossing their fingers under the table, are there no repercussions? the reason we have hearings is to ask these specific questions. and clearly, they want telling the truth. or at the very least, weren t being straight. so, i think the idea of having hearings in order to really understand what we, you know, people have been considered for the bench truly
important precedent of the supreme court. it was decided in 1973. so, it has been on the books for a long time. i would tell you that roe v. wade decided in 1973, as a president of the united states supreme court. it is a president of the united states supreme court. it was reaffirmed in casey 1992. it decided a lot of cases. senator, i said that it is settled as a precedent of the supreme court. and entitled under principles legally. roe v. wade clearly casey upheld at central holding. and spelled out in greater detail the test that the court uses to consider the look galaxy of abortion regulations. tonight s last word is precedent. the 11th but hour with stephanie ruhle starts now. stephanie ruhle starts now
let me ask you this. have you, made any decision in your own mind whether you feel roe v. wade was properly decided on? without saying with that decision is? i have not made, senator, a decision one way or the other, with respect to that court decision. we re versus wade is an important precedent of the supreme court. it was decided in 1973. so, it has been on the books for a long time. i would tell you that roe v. wade decided in 1973, as a president of the united states supreme court. it is a president of the united states supreme court. it was reaffirmed in casey 1992. it decided a lot of cases. senator, i said that it is settled as a precedent of the supreme court. and entitled under principles legally. roe v. wade clearly casey upheld at central
factors that go into analyzing president have to be considered. it is a president of the united states supreme court. it was reaffirmed in casey in 1992. and then several other cases. so, a good judge will consider as president of the united states supreme court, where the extremist of precedent, like any other. have your views on whether rural is settled precedent, or could be overturned? and has your views changed since you are in the white house? senator, i said that it is settled as a precedent of the supreme court entitled to respect under the principles of this isis. i will we need to keep in mind about roe v. wade is that it has been reaffirmed many times over the past 45 years, as you know. and, most prominently, most importantly, reaffirmed in
have your views on whether rural is settled precedent, or could be overturned? and has your views changed since you are in the white house? senator, i said that it is settled as a precedent of the supreme court entitled to respect under the principles of this . i will we need to keep in mind about roe v. wade is that it has been reaffirmed many times over the past 45 years, as you know. and, most prominently, most importantly, reaffirmed in planned parenthood versus casey in 1992. and as you well recall, senator, i know when that case came up, the supreme court didn t just reaffirm it in passing, the court specifically went through all the factors of stare decisis in considering whether