recognize precedent under oath, a contradiction displayed most blatantly today by trump appointee brett kavanaugh. i understand the importance of the precedent set forth in roe v. wade. settled as a precedent of the supreme court. it has been reaffirmed many times. planned parent hood vs. casey reaffirmed roe, casey now becomes the precedent on precedent. you think of some of the most important cases, most consequential cases in this court s history. there are a string of them where the cases overruled precedent. if the court in those cases had listened and adhered to lockner and if the court had done that in those cases, the country would be a much different place. just a glaring contradiction there. the first statements of his
Precedent
Brett-kavanaugh
Contradiction
Oath
Trump-appointee
Importance
Set-forth
Times
Casey-now
Casey
Precedent-of-the-supreme-court
Roe