to concessional finance, to the grounds of the world bank system? not all countries, and it needs to be more. lastly, the world bank needs to grow needs to grow its balance sheet by bringing in the private sector, so and the interesting thing, stephen, is it s notjust mia mottley, it s notjust the global south but now also the global north, led by president macron, are unified behind this sort of re shift in the direction of travel, so the bridgetown initiative, de facto, stephen, is the new bretton woods moment we had 80 years ago. so, you are saying, in a word, that you believe there are ways in which we humans can find ways to successfully avert climate catastrophe? so, i don t want to come across as being naive and overly optimistic. i, of course, see there is an abundance of challenges and a scarcity of time but that doesn t mean that we have zero solutions and no time left.
quite deliberately to tackle forms of radicalization, not just by al qaeda or by isis, but this type, too. under the new administration, there was an effort to take away grants awarded to groups trying to help with this part of the problem and to focus exclusively on the international. mr. ali, in terms of the fbi s resources, but also the broader resources of the government, have those sorts of rollbacks been meaningful in terms of our capacity? i was in the fbi for 11 years and i saw internally how the fbi was trying to manage, smartly, the sort of prioritization of the domestic terrorism threat, with multiple manifestations of it to include the far-right threat, but also the international terrorism component. and since 9/11, the scales tipped on that much more towards the international terrorism side. after the past few years, it s had to rebalance and re-shift. i still think there s a discrepancy there. but the fbi is doing yeoman s work to try to combat this threat. but again,
fbi s resources, but also the broader resources of the government, have those sorts of rollbacks been meaningful in terms of our capacity? i was in the fbi for 11 years and i saw internally how the fbi was trying to manage, smartly, the sort of prioritization of the domestic terrorism threat, with multiple manifestations of it to include the far-right threat, but also the international terrorism component. and since 9/11, the scales tipped on that much more towards the international terrorism side. after the past few years, it s had to rebalance and re-shift. i still think there s a discrepancy there. but the fbi is doing yeoman s work to try to combat this threat. but again, it doesn t have enough resources on that pure domestic terrific side. so they would have to make an internal decision to shift more