is a good samaritan thing to go to the people in need to inform them of if they are coming to the united states this is what you need to do at the port of entry. here is the reason to seek asylum. pursecution. credible fear of pursecution due to race, religion and a particular social group or political opinion. a lot of people from honduras are coming because of economic occurrence. theyment a better life. a lot in africa want a better life they they can t come from mexico an economic concern masquerading as a claim pr prosecution or so fourth? for the grounds of asylum of easy, raeshgs rchlthz national
a social scientist interested in understanding the processes of government. my role was one of a participant, even when acted as an internal critic. having expressed my objections, i stayed in place, observed, took part. in short, i did the jobs assigned to me. henry david thoreau said, cast your whole vote, not a strip of paper, merely, but your whole influence. what if i were willing to give up my top secret clearance, my career, my privileged access to decision makers? what if i gave all that up? what if were willing to risk pr prosecution? and i thought, all right, i have in my safe, thousands of pages of documents that give the lie
don t want to hear the facts. and you know, that s on them. you don t want to hear the facts, then go tell that to the american people. go explain to the american people why why it is that, wh r coretta scott king says many elderly blacks this is under jeff sessions and his pr prosecution were visited multiple times by the fbi who hauled them over 150 miles by bus to a grand jury in mobile, when they could more easily have testified at a grand jury 20 miles away in selma. these voters and others have announced they are now never going to vote again. look at those facts before anyone votes on jeff sessions to be attorney general of the united states. and are republicans essentially trying to do themselves a favor by elevating you? they see you as somebody who is on the left of the democratic party? you d have to ask a republican about that. i have no idea what they re doing. and one final question.
perhaps in a prior time of detention, he did something to hurt himself. so they re looking for that prior behavior to say in this case, he did something to exasperate his own prior injury and that s what caused his death, not the officers actions. the defense wants to create doubt here and i think we should also note that there re a number of other officers who are awaiting trial. how might the judge s decision here affect these other cases? exactly. well this officer that s going to trial right now is the driver of the van. so a lot of people say he s the most culpable. he has the most serious charges because the prosecution is saying that the injuries happened while he was driving the van. based on what he did intentionally to that van. which then caused the injuries to the victim in the case. the other officers obviously all of their culpability falls upon that. if in this case, the jury said look it was more the victim s
when you look at the sheer number of accuser, i think last count, it was 57 women who have come forward and they re accusing him of sexually assaulting them. the statute of limitations has run out on all of them. if the prosecution had their way they ll try to create a parade of alleged victims to convince the jury that this is a pattern of behavior. absolutely. and this is going to be some of the the strategy that we see going on between the prosecution and defense. in the pretrial motions before it actually gets to trial, what is going to be allowed in on what we call prior bad acts? prior bad act evidence is usually kept out, because we re not allowed to put on something that says, look, this guy has a propensity to do this, so he must have done it in this case. they want their jury to focus solely on the evidence in this case. however, there are exceptions to allowing in prior bad acts. there s a unique signature to