time, the supreme court, 5-4, is saying it s okay, leave this law in effect. that s something i have never seen before. it s something roberts, apparently, had never seen before. but i think it s indicative of how aggressive the conservative majority is going to be on the court on this issue and perhaps others. senator davis, the court did allow a ppotential avenue for abortion providers for challenge of the law. but it s always seemed like the point of the law was to make providing abortions so expensive and legally difficult, it s essentially impossible for them to operate in texas. does anything about today s decision change that? no, nothing does. and the only thing the report really opened in terms of a window today is to prevent state licensing authorities from basically taking the license of doctors away under senate bill 8. but it completely left in place the vigilante piece of this law. and what roberts was expressing his concern about today it was almost as though you c
Mercato | Mercato - Barcelone : Ça s emballe en coulisse pour Xavi Hernandez !
le10sport.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from le10sport.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
trying to give republican allies of president trump some talking points to use in his defense as they try to run out the clock here. but house speaker nancy pelosi has made clear that this argument made by the white house has no legal ground that it s not based on the constitution, certainly not based in-house precedent. and so what we ve heard from adam schiff is that in the face of anymore stonewalling past democrats aren t going to seek legal remedy through the courts. what they re going to do is chalk that up as a new potential avenue, another article of impeachment, and beyond that adam schiff says they re going to draw an adverse inference. that means if the white house won t give them documents on a subject, they will assume the underlying evidence, the underlying claim is true. they will take that stonewalling to be some sort of confirmation. on the sondland point which i think is fairly instructive as as you mentioned my colleagues and i confirmed today there was