so, on to the scientific evidence, the cell phone first. lawyer fleisher found a mistake and a chart that states expert had. use was the expert analysis, in fact, sloppy? if you are such a hot shot expert, how did this air happen? he said, oh well it was a mistake. the same for the dna evidence. attack the credibility of the analysis. the defense said that dna results were turned within a few days were rushed through the police lab because of rothstein s connections. attorney fleisher also suggested there could ve been cross contamination to tilt the scale, so the results pointed at tony. our goal was to educate the jury on the rothstein connections and the rothstein influence. and metal with physical evidence, contaminated, maybe? we can only speculate. but when a man is as powerful a guy as rothstein was, people would think that they could do things. they can conjure a beanie. and use it to frame tony
lawyer fletcher found a mistake in the chart that was used. was the expert analysis sloppy? if you re a hot-shot expert, how does this error creep in. it was a mistake. reporter: the same went for the dna evidence. attack the credibility of the analysis. the defense said the dna results returned within a few days were rushed with the police lab was a of rothstein s connections. attorney fletcher suggested there could have been cross-contamination to tip the scale. our goal was to educate the jury on the rothstein connections and the rothstein influence. reporter: had meddled with the physical evidence. contaminated, maybe? we can only speculate. but when a man is as powerful a guy as rothstein was, people would think they could do things. they could conjure up dna. reporter: and use it to frame tony viagas.
evidence, the cellphone first. lawyer fleisher found a mistake in a chart the state s expert had used. was the expert analysis, in fact, sloppy? if you re su a hot shot expert right. and how does this error creep in? and he said, well, it was a mistake. the same went for the dna evidence, attack the credibility of the analysis. the defense said the dna results, returned within a few days, were rushed through the police lab because of rothstein s connections. attorney fleisher also suggested there could have been cross contamination to tilt the scale so the results pointed at tony. our goal was to educate the jury on the rothstein connections, and the rothstein influence. had meddled with the physical evidence? contaminated it maybe? we can only speculate. but when a man is as powerful a guy as rothstein was, people would think that they could do things. they could conjure up dna. and use it to frame
rolling down tony s cheek so on to the scientific evidence, the cell phone first. lawyer fleischer found a mistake in a chart the state s expert had used. was this expert analysis, in fact, sloppy. if you re such a hot shot the expert and he said it was a mistake. the same went for the dna evidence attack the credibility of the analysis. the defense said that dna results return within a few days were rushed through the police lab because of rothstein s connections. there could have been cross contamination to tilt the scale so the results pointed at tony. our goal was to educate the jury on the rothstein connections and the rothstein influence. had meddled with the physical evidence, contaminated it maybe. we can only speculate but when a man is as powerful a guy as rothstein was people would think that they could do things,