impeachment. it has no basis in fact or in evidence, but rather is deeply rooted in personal opinion and perception. mr. turley also explained implications of this occurrence. we have never impeached a president solely or largely on a non-criminal abuse of power allegation. there is good reason for that unbroken record. abuses of power tend to be less defined ando more debatable th some of the crimes already mentioned. he went one dy to say the princ problem with proving an abuse of power theory is the lack of direct evidence due to the failure to compel key witnesses to testify or production of key documents. let s talk about the direct evidence they have. there is none. the only person that would have firsthand knowledge of the quid pro e quo, bribery, extortion o whatever buzzwords democrats want to trot out next is president zelensky who has denied any agreement or pressure. here in lies the problem. the facts don t support your