everyone we have had post-watergate. george w. bush left the white house with his approval in the toilet, couldn t buy a good story. it s what they do. it donald trump did one thing, the most important thing he has done for the republican party, a party i am a proud member of, is that he taught us to simply cower when they tell you a racist, took a shower when they call you these terrible names, is the wrong strategy. the right strategy is to go right back at them, and the american people at least 50% of them are overjoyed that the values that conservatives care about have a great champion who is willing to fight as hard back as the liberals and these reporters are against us. sean: americans knew and they knew trump was a disrupter, and iconoclast, that he said he was going to clean up the swamp, and he s going to break things in the process. and guess what? he s getting the job done. news flash for the press corps: they think barack obama was popular when he left office? tw
lying. it s almost like this strange parallel universe where you re dragged into his brain and sort of thrash around in this reality of, you know, the rapists and the women with the tape. it s been debunked and debunked and debunked. you just have to hear it again. it s crazy. but legally, isn t he free to free associate like that and to call everybody a liar and to negate all factual information to the contrary, because if a president, not just him, any president calls something an emergency, legally it s an emergency? the national emergencies act in this sense is the worst thing that could have happened to the republic because it was trying to constrain at the time, 1976, post-watergate, the declarations of emergencies, but what it in fact did was not define what an emergency is. not enumerate what the qualities might be. it essentially gave the president carte blanche to just say this one is an emergency. you re right. it plays into that.
it s almost like this strange parallel universe where you re dragged into his brain and sort of thrash around in this reality of, you know, the rapists and the women with the tape. it s been debunked and debunked and debunked. you just have to hear it again. it s crazy. but legally, isn t he free to free associate like that and to call everybody a liar and to negate all factual information to the contrary, because if a president, not just him, any president calls something an emergency, legally it s an emergency? the national emergencies act in this sense is the worst thing that could have happened to the republic because it was trying to constrain at the time, 1976, post-watergate, the declarations of emergencies, but what it in fact did was not define what an emergency is. not enumerate what the qualities might be. it essentially gave the president carte blanche to just say this one is an emergency. you re right. it plays into that. so when nadler and the judiciary committee, i
statistics, including, you know, his own experts are lying. and nancy s lying and chuck is lying. it s almost like this strange parallel universe where you re dragged into his brain and sort of thrash around in this reality of, you know, the rapists and the women with the tape. it s been debunked and debunked and debunked. you just have to hear it again. it s crazy. but legally, isn t he free to free associate like that and to call everybody a liar and to negate all factual information to the contrary, because if a president, not just him, any president calls something an emergency, legally it s an emergency? the national emergencies act in this sense is the worst thing that could have happened to the republic because it was trying to constrain at the time, 1976, post-watergate, the declarations of emergency, but what it in fact did was not define what an emergency is. not enumerate what the qualities might be. it essentially gave the president carte blanche to say
if the president will compromise but he will not capitulate. that s where we are at. i m not going to negotiate with somebody who calls the border patrol agents a bunch of nazis when they are trying to defend the border against a mob. dana: i think we have to start with our newest fox news contributor, emily. congratulations. we are glad you are a contributor to fox news. we ll give you the first shot of about the president addressing the nation tomorrow night. emily: it s honored to be part of this family. thank you. jesse: you re welcome. emily: what s important for me is for viewers to understand what it would look like if the president ashley declared a national emergency and what trickles down from that. in the 70s, this act was passed, post-watergate and post-vietnam. the main thing you have to do a site a specific emergency provision, and emergency power that activates what he s asking for. there are hundreds of them. there are hundreds of provisions under this act, and