leading sponsor of terrorism to be the power, you think we have problem in north korea, get ready for iran, north korea on steroids at some point, we need to know that white house has not shown any willingness to use force. attacks on u.s. troops and forces and interests and institutions in iraq and syria. attacks agency our allies and proxies and against israel, almost no response, two pinpoint strike on the iraqi-syrian border over a year and a half of dozens of attacks again u.s. troops. a contractor died in iraq last march, no military response, unlike what we saw president trump do with killing of suleimani. if i were the iranians, i
u.s. you are right, unbelieve able to think where we have come over the last year and a half under the biden administration s failed policies to iran from maximum pressure to maximum deference almost overnight on january 20, 2021, no more military deterrents, no economic sanction enforcement, export of oil 900,000 barrels a day, most to china, no crackdown. iranians feeling pretty good economically, relative to where they were. no pressure in vienna at u.n. watch dog. the question that iranians have, why would we constrain ourselves in the region and slowdown our sponsorship with terrorism. we don t face any consequences right now from the united states of
u.s. you are right, unbelieve able to think where we have come over the last year and a half under the biden administration s failed policies to iran from maximum pressure to maximum deference almost overnight on january 20, 2021, no more military deterrents, no economic sanction enforcement, export of oil 900,000 barrels a day, most to china, no crackdown. iranians feeling pretty good economically, relative to where they were. no pressure in vienna at u.n. watch dog. the question that iranians have, why would we constrain ourselves in the region and slowdown our sponsorship with terrorism. we don t face any consequences right now from
a moral poison in doing this as well. is there not. sure. mark: where is the constitutional power for president of united states to wave a magic wand and eliminate a contractual requirement for someone to payback what they took from someone el. else. it would be better for the economy if they wanted to get rid of credit card loans, the origins of a lot of this had president obama was in office, they kicked out middle man, the banks and other folks involved in student loan process, and said it was unfair, social justice, and make sure that everyone is go to school. people who study risk would say, i can t give you a loan
iran s ties to china are stronger, and ties to russia are more stronger it is more complicated than needed. we have a president of the united states who wants to promote aggressively gun control against innocent american citizens. as if that will resolve anything. and at the same time, he is leading an administration with a failed diplomatic national security agenda. which will ensure that a terrorist state, has nuclear weapons, effective nuclear weapons. how about we have some nuclear weapons control in the middle east rather than benning over back ward back warred, the more and more i fear there is only one way out it has to be to strike the