had been somewhat dormant. but there is a backlash to the obama legacy. obama still won a resounding election in 2012 because he did two things. he motived the young voters, the minority voters, the women voters to turnout, and he ran a populist message against mitt romney. and if you look at the democrats running, if you look at someone like elizabeth warren, you to do two things. you have to stand up to trump. you have to give that part of the democratic coalition a belief that you re fighting for them, that you re principled, that you re giving them reason to turn out like they turned out in 2012 and 2018. and go right at trump and say this guy said he was going stand up for you and the only thing he did is stand up for his friends and rich corporation. a tax giveaway that is in your expense. trump has a democratic house. he has no legislative agenda. he has nothing to talk about when it comes to health care or the issues that americans actually care about, right. so the democrat ha
a lot of over the last couple of months. i think something else she s done that s very savr vy is bei the star on the first night of the debate gave her an opportunity to have a breakout moment and introduce herself. she s running on a populist message where she s running against corporations, running against big business, almost more so than running against president trump but she s not wrapping herself in the overt language of the word socialism. bernie sanders is a couple of weeks ago gave a speech sort of defending the concept of democratic socialism. elizabeth warren stays away from that, stays on safer ground with a very progressive economic agenda. some folks on the republican side would call socialist adjacent. she herself stays away from that word and that s very powerful, and important, showing democratic voters have a populist economic view but aren t necessarily willing to go all the way bernie sanders is. she said i m a proud
away. dana: robinson, he has a weekly column. he says in regard to several of these candidates, there is another important role to fill. i am talking to you, who would have a good chance of beating cory gardiner. i m talking to you, steve bullock, of montana. i m even talking to you, beto o rourke, who would have a better chance against john cornyn. but these guys are sending signals that they do not plan to run for the senate. i would argue that even if they wish to change their mind, it s already too late for some of them. he has had to take positions that are far to the left of where the montana party would be normally, and just look at last cycle. we had john hester, running for reelection, how much she supported president trump. that s a far cry from governor bella, now running for president. he has a kind of populist
reflects donald trump s popularity profile. he is popular with his republican base, but he hasn t been able to persuade or reach out to anyone in the middle. elizabeth warren has a similar popularity profile, not comparing the two, but she is very popular among her progressive base but has doesn t reach out the the middle. one thing about amy klobuchar has an advantage over most of the candidates that i ve seen, and i m not assessed them all, i just know watching her personally is she is really terrific at retail politics. and that s going to make a difference in places like iowa. retail politics. you see elizabeth warren, who is there and there are a lot of o people saying she is key with that, she has a populist message, launched her campaign yesterday. here is a look back and she spoke today. what donald trump does everyday, everyday, there is a racist tweet, a hateful tweet, something really dark and ugly, but here is how i see it.
sunsets on the individual side in 2025 and reverts to 2016 levels, so those deductions we don t have today, state and local income taxes, mortgage rate deductions and the like, will go back in 2025 to the levels we saw prior to the enactment of this particular rule. so, it s going to be a while, but unless congress and the president agree to some changes, this is where we are for the moment. given elizabeth warren, who kicked off her presidential bid officially yesterday, and her populist message and looking for economic development and equity and the like, her financial platform includes a wealth tax on those with assets over $50 million. she s banning wells fargo from college campuses. i want you to explain that. and then also breaking up monopolies. the wells fargo component, is that because of the track record over the last couple years? i believe that s the case, yeah, the fact that they ve run into serious regulatory issues over the last several years, fake accounts that were