mystery. it s not a mystery it s what the potential presidential candidate for 2016 was playing to the large number of evangelicals who believe in the literal truth of the bible. fast forward to yesterday when rubio was given a retake on that pop question by politico s mike all allen. there is no scientific debate on the age of the earth. it s established pretty definitively. at least 4.5 billion years old. i was referring to a these logical debate, which is a pretty healthy debate. rubio went on to say americans should teach children science but they also have the right to teach them religion. that s interesting. senator, you can t teach religion in public schools. by the way, think about it, what religion would you teach in public schools? would you want to decide that? this is america.
through a whole series of issues with you. you ve got to take those cards. you ve got to take your notes and you ve got to go back and begin to internalize this so that when you run into, you know, a board meeting like that or a reporter out on the campaign trail who asks the pop question, you can, you know, just viscerally respond with your answer because you know it. you ve internalize it had and understand exactly the nuances of it, and i think that s the part that s been a little bit of a struggle for herman in just terms of taking all of the complexities of foreign policy and internalizing in such a way that when you re asked about libya, you know two, three things off the top of your head that you want to respond to immediately because what you would do as president is a, b and c. yeah. and so that i think is the stumbling block right now. here s my tough critique. you know, darn it, it s not just an analytical problem for this guy, dana, and michael, it s not just an answe
pelosi. amy, you ll start. pop question. i guess, what, jaws 4. oh, that s bad. all right, bob, go ahead. well, you know, i m trying to think of a movie now and the only one i can think of are not for family television. this is a cool bunch. this is a tough group. let s always remember the robert redford movie when he is the candidate and he wins unexpectedly and he looks at his adviser and says, what do we do now? that seems to be the question the democrats have. now what when it comes to congressional democrats. the one thing nancy pelosi can do that john boehner can t is cry. let s call it no tears. tears of the thank you so much, ari, amy and bob franken. the crying game. very interesting conversation, shall we say. have a good one. how is the late anna nicole smith tied into the wikileaks
with you, you ve got to take those cards, you ve got to take your notes, and you ve got to go back and begin to internalize this, so when you run into a board meeting like that or a reporter out on the campaign trail who asks the pop question, you can, you know, just vis viscerally respond. that s been a struggle for herman, taking all the complexities of foreign policy, and internalizing it in such a way that when you re asked about libya, you know two, three things off the top of your head that you want to respond to immediately, because what you would do as president is a, b, and c. so, i think, is the stumbling block right now. here s my tough critique. you know, darn it, it s not just an analytical problem for this guy, dana, and michael, it s not just an answer the tricky question from the tricky reporter, who s trying to catch you. most americans had a human response when they heard that