that you do have an agenda in terms of what you think. you have a clear point of view on that. but the implication is that you are an objective reporter who s pommel gating a point of view. you said openly you don t think your point of view is biassed. but what i said about the president had nothing to do with statues. i was talking about his behavior on stage. again, totally understood but the way it read is that you have a personal anmous towards the president. whether it s true or not, that s the way a lot of his followers are going to take it. i have aminous against a guest on the show or someone in the street who has ignorance of history. you need to be able to defend yourself and to defend yourself, to have a right, clear perspective you need know history and be educated about it and in many cases the people fighting for the issues do not.