such an exodus but at the same time pakistan has been providing every support that it could to facilitate the evacuation of all those wanting to leave afghanistan. we have worked with almost 2a countries in facilitating the evacuation of their nationals and we continue to stay engaged. as of today almost over 9000 people have actually transited through pakistan and we are still engaged with the international community to facilitate those evacuations. community to facilitate those evacuations. ., , ., evacuations. but what is your actual strate: evacuations. but what is your actual strategy and evacuations. but what is your actual strategy and policy evacuations. but what is your actual strategy and policy vis-a-vis - strategy and policy vis a vis afghanistan when we talk about the humanitarian side? is it and we are
vexed by cuba for about six decades. we have had some very colorful plots exploding cigars, poison pens, mafia hits, some would say plots as colorful as bret baier s golf attire. bret: nicely done. jesse: they have all failed unlike your golf game of the our policy vis-a-vis the cuban regime has been a failure. and am i optimistic that president biden can somehow oversee democratic revolution there, whether he has his hands off or is engineering it from behind the scenes? absolutely not. it s history as any guide. so i think if there is a revolution there, it will be bloody. but, it has to come from the cuban people. and it has to be timed perfectly. after all of this time, i think i speak for all americans, it s just maddening that you have a communist outpost, 90 miles from
doors. he testified that his concern was that the call was leaked but he didn t think there was anything wrong with the call. sam, your thoughts on that. well, for better or for worse, christi, it s not up to tim morrison whether there was anything wrong with the call. he was called to give his account of what happened and serve as a witness. the jury in this case or the investigators are members of congress. to a certain extent the american people. but tim morrison as a senior director at the white house, his entire job, let s just remember who he is or was. it s to develop, coordinate and monitor u.s. policy vis-a-vis countries like ukraine. we learned last night, for example, that he was spending time trying to fact check ambassador to the eu gordon sondland. sondland s statements that the president did want a quid pro quo. what we learned from all of this is that tim morrison was not able to do his actual job, which was policy implementation,
that may have been because the president didn t particularly want to hear from him. but you know, it s certainly true that he has been very hawkish on iran. i think he has held very dangerous views, dangerous positions on iran. that he was probably among others in urging the president to withdraw from the jcpoa, which i think has had really significant adverse consequences for the country. so on iran i think he has been a singularly bad influence on the president. but as we have seen in many other things and with many other cabinet officials, even though he had often disagreements apparently with the president, it didn t stop him from serving as an enabler of this president, both in terms of the disastrous policy vis-a-vis north korea and with respect to the taliban summit but also sticking to the president even when he at least purportedly had these profound differences. what does it mean to your
he didn t contribute at all to the conversation. down, they go up and down. and that may have been a his have been in a very tight trading range and it shows that reflection this was on the eve people s minds about him is made of the president s decision to pull back from a strike on iran. that may have been because the president didn t particularly want to hear from him. up are made up. but their minds about whoever but you know, it s certainly the fill-in-the-blank democrat, true that he has been very hawkish on iran. that s up in the air and he s got to make it a choice. i think he has held very one of the most important dangerous views, dangerous aspects of it being a referendum on donald trump, if that s what positions on iran. it turns out to be, is the vote for third-party candidates could evaporate because that voter in wisconsin who cast a vote for jill stein probably won t be that he was probably among doing that this time if that voter is much more concerned others in ur