about jihad. first of all, there are not really many interpretations. that s spin. jihad equals holy war, number one. he didn t answer the question by then going out of his way to talk about muslims that are not radical jihaddists. why did he do that? reality is that the president denies that we are in a war on terror. that policy stance, that outreach to muslims, has basically failed. we are under organized attack from overseas and it is islamic attack on america. at home he pursues a policy of extraordinary political correctness. that is opening the door to terror at home. he wouldn t even acknowledge the term war on terror. man-caused disaster, overseas contingency operations. fort hood was not workplace violence, it was a terror attack. we should get the information out of the terrorist who is
down. of course, looking at this from the other side, it would be very awkward if mr. romney did demand to have that ad taken down, since the policy stance on this issue that mr. mourdock has is the exact same policy stance held by the man mr. romney chose as his vice presidential running mate, paul ryan. and it is moments like these, it is days like this on the campaign trail when it is never more clear that this is not the next this is not the next national election after 2008. this is the next national election after 2010, which is the election where the republican party not only did great, importantly, in terms of understanding republican party politics, they ran five different candidates for the united states senate that year, who blew through what was previously, even the anti-abortion movement s rough consensus, that even if you did want to make abortion a criminal offense in america, you would at least not force that government decision on women who got pregnant through rape
the other side, it would be very awkward if mr. romney did demand to have that ad taken down, since the policy stance on this issue that mr. mourdock has is the exact same policy stance held by the man mr. romney chose as his vice presidential running mate, paul ryan. and it is moments like these, it is days like this on the campaign trail when it is never more clear that this is not the next this is not the next national election after 2008. this is the next national election after 2010, which is the election where the republican party not only did great, importantly, in terms of understanding republican party politics, they ran five different candidates for the united states senate that year, who blew through what was previously, even the anti-abortion movement s rough consensus, that even if you did want to make abortion a criminal offense in america, you would at least not force that government decision on women who got pregnant through rape or through incest. it was 2010, with t
perplexing that he would not demand to have that ad taken down. of course, looking at this from the other side, it would be very awkward if mr. romney did demand to have that ad taken down, since the policy stance on this issue that mr. mourdock has is the exact same policy stance held by the man mr. romney chose as his vice presidential running mate, paul ryan. and it is moments like these, it is days like this on the campaign trail when it is never more clear that this is not the next this is not the next national election after 2008. this is the next national election after 2010, which is the election where the republican party not only did great, importantly, in terms of understanding republican party politics, they ran five different candidates for the united states senate that year, who blew through what was previously, even the anti-abortion movement s rough consensus, that even if you did want to make abortion a criminal offense in america, you would at least not force that
our allies across the globe to condemn this horrific attack. i think the obama administration had a great opportunity to sofl this crisis a long time ago when he said the red line in the sand. and when he didn t cross that line after making the threat, i think that set us back a long ways. not only in syria, but in many other parts of the world. the president later moved on from the blame game while hinting at a change in his policy stance towards syria without getting into the details. i now have responsibility and i will have that responsibility and carry it very proudly. it crossed a lot of lines for me. when you kill innocent children, innocent babies, babies, little babies, with a chemical gas that is so lethal that people were shocked to hear what gas it was, that crosses many, many lines, beyond a red line.