now. what goes through your mind when you hear that? i think, what my father did very effectively in that interview, and i think it s something that a lot of us could learn from, he really asked donald trump policy questions. and did not get much into personal. that is something where, i think, were very well served in our democracy when there s a focus on policy. and those type of specific questions about, okay, you are republican yesterday, your democrat a few years ago, now you hear. what is the policy shifts that have led you to go to a new party? in that case, republican party got to right. i think today, he s gone full circle in that. on that proclamation. it s honing in on what you do specifically, regarding health care. would you do specifically regarding nuclear weapons. or did you specifically regarding income inequality, et cetera. instead of the personal politics which a lot of politicians are much more comfortable playing in, they
companies have driven the price of a vial of insulin through the roof. in the last 20 years alone, the average price of insulin has increased more than 200%. some insulin product prices are increasing by 1000% in the same timeframe. so, what is behind eli lilly s sudden change of heart? well, it is not just altruism. first, there has been increasing public and political outrage. second, there have been policy shifts at state and federal levels. for example, last year, provision in the inflation reduction act attempted to cap the cost $35. republicans blocked the provision for anyone not on medicaid. finally, eli lilly gladly wanting to get ahead of looming market competition. in the last few months, a non profit generic drugmaker announced it will begin producing insulin for no more than $30 per vial. then, california announced a plan to produce its own insulin, kept at $30 per mile as well.
The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is aggressively enforcing and expanding the scope of criminal antitrust cases it is willing to bring, including a first wave of novel criminal no-poach cases.
culture and not training, and how do you break that culture? i think that it is going to take time and intentional policy shifts and change. for one, we have to build back the trust that we are seeing the widening gap between the public as well as the police and the first responders, and so we have to make sure as policy changers and policy implementers that it goes directly with the overview and oversight and audits that when we are recruiting the members, that we are asking them to follow in the line of protect and serve. if they do see that type of culture present in training to stray away from it to let us know. the memphis police chief dissolved the scorpion unit, the anti-crime unit that the officers were involved in, but there are 30 members of the unit
editor celia hatton. when you look at the overall tone of this speech, what strikes you? i this speech, what strikes you? i think stephen summed it up really well, you know, the chinese leader really emphasised stability above all else. i mean, that really was the focus. he is the man in control, he has been at the helm for ten years, he s going to stay in power, no major policy initiatives announced today, but maybe that s kind of a point. hejust wants people to rest assured he is in charge and the country will continue on, so some were hoping that he would for example to china s zero covid strategy and there are hopes they will keep it in place until the important party congress and this will be the moment xi jinping would make many people happy, but that didn t happen. you know, really, it s a bit more of the same. he did allude to some big policy shifts coming down the pipe, perhaps something to do with climate,