open testimony challenging by the former cia director. and democrats are blasting republicans a cowing them of politicalizing the tragedy. it is not simple over sight to get to a better policy result. it is relentlessly partisan. the chairman led the charge. between nonexistent scheduleand for political purposes. and we ll talk about this. and kirsten and david. how are you guys doing in and good day to both of you. krifrten, where are you? i am in tucson, arizona. you win. fantastic. and so now, listen, do
could this policy result in mer son nar reaction, execution instead of detention? these are all complicated questions and as all things in afghanistan, who knows what the blowback will be or where it will go? coming up on the lead senator ted cruz is causing problems for his party again. plus, the president refused to pick between hillary clinton and joe biden when i asked him. so can charles barkley get him on the record in the lebron versus debate. that s coming up.
so that meant we didn t have a very clear strategy or a very clear definition of what we were going to do if the situation escalated, which is exactly whath it has done. governor pawlenty, in a recent interview, you faulted president obam for saying that u.s. policy was to oppose dictator muammar al-qaddafi and failing to send in special forces to do the job. wouldn t your policy result in either chaos or prolonged u.s. involvement? muammar al-qaddafi has american blood on his hands, hawfnl he killed americans and others as they flew from europe to the united states, some years ago. he killed americans in a disco in europe. ron paul tried to kill muammar al-qaddafi in the 80s. he missed him not by much. president reagan was right in that regard. i called for the establishment or the threat of the no-fly zone, i think one of the first