when people want different things change there is an optimal. there is an outcome where people can, the presence of his money may be not like the bill but like it. i think was notable that the president reached out to senator joe manchin iii of west virginia. a democrat. it is clear they are concerned about the five and they do not believe that they can change senator rand paul s mind for senator mike lee. that is two. they can only afford to lose two.so they are looking at democrats that they can sway. but senator manchin has said he will not support the bill. josh, you have been in the leadership operation over there on republican side. you think there is a hope that any democrat will come over? senator durbin says he can identify one to vote for the bill. i think the democratic party is not your grandfather s democratic party. i think they will oppose donald trump at every possible corner no matter what. basically no matter the policy
when people want different things change there is an optimal. there is an outcome where people can, the presence of his money may be not like the bill but like it. i think was notable that the president reached out to senator joe manchin iii of west virginia. a democrat. it is clear they are concerned about the five and they do not believe that they can change senator rand paul s mind for senator mike lee. that is two. they can only afford to lose two.so they are looking at democrats that they can sway. but senator manchin has said he will not support the bill. josh, you have been in the leadership operation over there on republican side. you think there is a hope that any democrat will come over? senator durbin says he can identify one to vote for the bill. i think the democratic party is not your grandfather s democratic party. i think they will oppose donald trump at every possible corner no matter what. basically no matter the policy outcome is.
when people want different things change there is an optimal. there is an outcome where people can, the presence of his money may be not like the bill but like it. i think was notable that the president reached out to senator joe manchin iii of west virginia. a democrat. it is clear they are concerned about the five and they do not believe that they can change senator rand paul s mind for senator mike lee. that is two. they can only afford to lose two.so they are looking at democrats that they can sway. but senator manchin has said he will not support the bill. josh, you have been in the leadership operation over there on republican side. you think there is a hope that any democrat will come over? senator durbin says he can identify one to vote for the bill. i think the democratic party is not your grandfather s democratic party. i think they will oppose donald trump at every possible corner no matter what. basically no matter the policy
both came on the same day. this was a huge step for the evangelicals who, in the last eight years, have been targeted against the obama administration. sissy, what do you say to the argument some people make this is nothing more than a protection from the irs for religious groups? i think this is just a message sent by the president in a strong voice for us. i m always for that more can be done to protect our religious freedoms. but i m thankful for this voice and for the stand he has taken. sarah, the acl, executive order anthony romero had a statement and said that this order was, quote, an elaborate photo op with no discernible policy outcome. do you get the sense he believes in this action or the possible intention is shut down the remnants of the obama administration? i think we can look to the president s past hundred days
endorsing or opposing specific political candidates. here is what the president promised to do in february at the national prayer breakfast. i will get rid of and totally destroy the johnson amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution. i will do that. remember. of course it would be impossible for an executive order to undo a law legislated by congress. and today the aclu quickly decided that president trump s executive order actually meant nothing and would do nothing. the aclu issued a statement saying today s executive order signing was an elaborate photo op with no discernible policy outcome. trump s assertion that he wished to totally destroy the johnson amendment with this order has proven to be a textbook case of fake news.