he doesn t throw red meat to that base. i think he identifies more with an effective and successful foreign policy that the republican presidents have pursued in the past. whether you start with eisenhower ronald reagan or h.w. bush or bush 41. he never identified with isolationism but he doesn t support a policy of open ended military interventionalism. he talks about a smart interif he thinksism where we re prepeared to use force. if you re articulating that vision, there will be a lot of people in the field, and rand paul, not a tremendous amount of experience, what you re describing sounds like the bell curve, why do i vote with him on that. as you describe it the middle
support a policy of open ended military interventionalism. he talks about a smart interif he thinksism where we re prepeared to use force. if you re articulating that vision, there will be a lot of people in the field, and rand paul, not a tremendous amount of experience, what you re describing sounds like the bell curve, why do i vote with him on that. as you describe it the middle of the bell curve. i think he is probably the best prepares of all of the republican candidates because he read more, and thought more and listens to a number of points of view. can you give me a current champ on that?