washington creating another department, another position, spending more money that we don t have in order to have a policy objective of continuing to advance fear among the american people. i think it would probably be a more advantageous use of our time, to develop a congressional stupidity alert system. this bill is about democratic fearmongering that gonzaga and ever-present threat and that we cannot be safe until big ever mid rounds of nicolas one of them. tara! i have a hard time listening to republicans, especially those republicans blaming democrats for fearmongering. what? listen, i m actually all four appropriating for a congressional stupidity alert system, because then half of congress would not be there. republicans, i don t know who they find to lead him anywhere, because they re a bunch of idiots, the way that they ve been acting lately. so much of what they ve been advocating and what they re doing is asinine. we are talking and watching kids and families get sla
compassion argument that democrats have about our immigration policy under trump. look at that, double the deaths. those people in the trailer, who passed away, let s not mince words about it, they were cooked alive in those trucks. this stuff is happening all the time. they re also dying along the desert. children are being abandoned, sexually assaulted. children thrown over walls. this is the least compassionate policy they have seen in the border. ought to be held accountable. pete: they say, we ll stop giving you the numbers. it is so bad, stop giving you the numbers. it is consolidation of a bureaucracy should be ashamed of itself, reporting those, demanding policymakers give them tools to do something about it. someone in washington, d.c. says stay out of news. rachel: they don t care about the gas prices. they have a policy objective. they don t care about the deaths of tease people, suffering, abandonment of people governor abbott talked about. they have a policy objective.
by israel to the russians. all the more reason trump was such a danger to our country as his former and rather solicitous at the time defense secretary mark esper is now revealing to sell a book. donald trump is best i can assess is a person driven by self-interest, and in the case of politics it s his re-election, and as i note in there he seemed to be willing to sacrifice anything to get there, whether it was a policy objective or people or our institutions. with trumpet russians were able to control the narrative, control events and it appears in some ways to control the white house. but they don t have that anymore under president joe biden as can be clearly seen in this administration s backing of ukraine. meanwhile, putin is lose control over the russian narrative on the war which is going very, very badly, but the consequences for ukranian civilians remains severe and appalling, and that is next. ains severe and applialng, and that is next. your projects done right . with an
questions from the outside, and you know, in your own words, what was donald trump? donald trump as best i can assess is a person driven by self-interest, and in the case of politics, it s his re-election, and as i note in there, he seemed to be willing to sacrifice anything to get there, whether it was a policy objective or people or our institutions. and i m an institutional person, if you will, whether it gets to dod and our national security apparatus. that s how i kind of size it up right there on the spot. when did you know? what s your first interaction with him where you know he s neither informed, nor an institutionalist, nor faithful to the office that he held? well, it s hard to pick a moment in time. you know, as i write in my book, the first realization i had that this job would be really different than what i expected was when we were at bedminster in august of 2019 discussing the
goal the policy objective is a nationwide and total ban on abortion, on women s rights in that area. the supreme court is very close to a ruling that, according to a lot of available evidence, could open the door to that option. in other words, the supreme court can make it easier for states to decide how to regulate or ban or limit abortion, and if they do that, essentially what many see would be gutting roe v. wade. if they do that, well, i m about to show you the evidence that conservatives are moving towards trying to make abortion something that people don t have access to in many or most parts of the country. this is something top republicans have been planning. as we stand here today, we may well be on the verge of an era when the supreme court sends roe vs. wade to the ash heap of history where it belongs. that was mike pence s view referring to the case i mentioned in the news right now