way.tr for that, which we sort of understand, i get it, to moving over to advocating specific policies that affect millions of americans, as if there is only one side of this debate. it moves from childish annoyance to fall on propaganda, doesn t it? of course. i ve heard journalists and other networks to say, is our obligation to continue to talk about the parkland shooting because we all went to the american people to get the conversation alive. if we don t talk about it, the conversation doesn t continue and policies don t change in washington, d.c. that doesn t sound like activism, i don t know what is. it is your job to report the news that is relevant and a mass shooting is of relevant. you cover it and move on as necessary. they are deciding with the coverage should dwell on. tucker: what is so striking is, if you pick a topic that the media would lobby on, maybe camera angles, lighting, they are our experts on that stuff. if there is any group in america
they don t like trump, i get it. from that, i get it, to moving over to advocating for specific policies affecting americans as if there is only one side of the debate. it moves to full on propaganda. of course. other journalists have said it s our obligation to talk about the parkland shooting. if we don t talk about it, the conversation doesn t continue and policies don t change in washington, d.c. it s your job to report the news that is relevant. a mass shooting is relevant. you cover it. then you move on. they are deciding what to cover. tucker: that s right. what is striking, if you were going to pick a topic the media would lobby on, camera angles or lithe?