To her son, kim, wholl be telling her how she is and what the world needs to do about burma. And this is a World Exclusive tv interview by by the sun. And also, can you believe it . Weve had people working from home now they want to work from the beach. Really are they working . I dont think so. Were going to be exposed doing that. And the councils whove agreed to the staff working from the beach. Nice work if you can get it. Nice work if you can get it. It certainly is. Or not. No work . No, cant do well exactly. Sunbathing and weve got an all star cast for our newspaper review this morning. Weve got mark director review this morning. Weve got mark of director review this morning. Weve got mark of institute ector review this morning. Weve got mark of institute of or general of the institute of economic and former Economic Affairs and former labour matthew lasso. Labour adviser matthew lasso. You wont want to miss what theyve say. And of theyve got to say. And of course, as always, we
This is tomorrow morning. No issues today. Ill have all the details on your friday forecast and your weekend forecast. Well talk more about the snow coming up in just a minute. Erin. Friday morning commute traffic is light in the district. Looking good on new york avenue so far. We have a problem in prince georges county. Utility work 214 at brightseat road. Watch for those closures in the left lanes. Well keep you updated and take a look at a crash on 29 out by timber wood on the top side of the beltway next. 7 01. Following breaking news from gaithersburg maryland where police are searching for three armed men. Were told the suspect stole weapons before they left or they fled. Fox5s mel i wa Melanie Alnwicks us live with the latest. Reporter good morning steve and allison. Still no information from police in terms of was this person targeted or was this completely random. But it was definitely a very scary situation here at the gaithersburg station apartments overnight last night. It
Three reasons. The privacy expectations when he locks his personal property in the cars locked trunk with the permission of the renter is contrary to this courts reasonable expectation of privacy test which looks to privacy expectations and not Contract Terms and not Property Rights and while the contract violation alleged here does not negate Fourth Amendment rights, its notable that mr. Byrds presence in the car and the government does not dispute this was not improper. His storing of his personal items in the trunk was not even a contract violation. Could he have been could he have been the renter given his criminal record . Perhaps not, your honor, but he was given permission by the renter to store his items in the locked trunk and the government does not argue that this was impermissible. Suppose hed been just a passenger . And the renter was there. Likewise, even if he was the passenger, if the person who has rented the car gives him permission to lock his own personal property i
Supreme court oral argument in byrd v. United states. The case hinges on the drivers right to a reasonable expectation of privacy. The court is deciding if that extends to a rental car that the driver did not rent and is not authorized to operate under the rental agreement. The oral argument lasts about an hour. Youll hear argument this morning in 1631 byrd versus united states. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, in this case, the government seems to transform a violation of a car rental agreement into a rule where unlisted drivers from no ability to even invoke the Fourth Amendment and the proposed rule should be objected for three reasons and ignoring the privacy expectations when he locks his personal property in the cars locked trunk with the permission of the renter is contrary to this courts reasonable expectation of privacy test which looks to privacy expectations and not Contract Terms and not Property Rights and while the contract violation alleged here does not negat
Where unlisted drivers have no ability to even invoke the Fourth Amendment and the proposed rule should be objected for three reasons. First, ignoring the privacy expectations when he locks his personal property in the cars locked trunk with the permission of the renter is contrary to this courts reasonable expectation of privacy test which looks to privacy expectations and not contract terms and not Property Rights and while the contract violation alleged here does not negate Fourth Amendment rights, its notable that mr. Byrds presence in the car and the government does not dispute this was not improper. His storing of his personal items in the trunk was not even a contract violation. Could he have been could he have been the renter given his criminal record . Perhaps not, your honor, but he was given permission by the renter to store his items in the locked trunk and the government does not argue that this was impermissible. Suppose hed been just a passenger . And the renter was ther